Talk:John O'Donovan (scholar)

Bar

Could the link to bar be updated to point to a page that is not a disambig? I was informed that the page that I linked to was not the proper one, so if somebody with a greater understanding of the subject could take care of it, that would be wonderful. --Maelnuneb (Talk) 19:35, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Done now bigpad 21:34, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Hoberlin or Oberlin?

Could some expert specify please. Also the children need clearer treatment. And what is "Cromwellian stock"? A descendant of Oliver Cromwell, or, I suspect, someone who was owed money in England in the 1650s and happened to take land in Ireland in recompense. How do we know that they had anything to do with Cromwell himself, his army or his policies? JO'D was an important man in many ways and this sort of sloppiness should not be on his wiki page.86.42.192.16 (talk) 08:48, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

First Topographer?

It is doubtful that O’Donovan was “Ireland’s first historic topographer”. Samuel Lewis (publisher) had published his extensive Topographical Dictionary of Ireland in two large volumes already in 1837, replete with a wealth of historical information for each location. O’Donovan was not amongst the thousands of subscribers thereto and listed therein. As the wiki article on Lewis indicates, his work “has not been superseded”. Perhaps the truth is that he was the first, but O’Donovan superseded him? Max Kaertner (talk) 18:35, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: various cited sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:02, 28 July 2018 (UTC)