Talk:Johnny Fripp

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Johnny Fripp, c. 1941 (cropped).png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:24, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Johnny Fripp/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: WikiOriginal-9 (talk · contribs) 07:42, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Notes

• Added Category:Royal Canadian Air Force personnel of World War II and skiing coaches.
• Could you find anything on his high school career? Did he play football or anything?
• What's the Dominion Championships? The article makes it sound like going to the Olympics is a downgrade.
• "competed against American and Austrian professionals" Those are both linked but Canadisn isn't linked in the lead and Americans is earlier in the body but not linked?
• "professionals and placed " A lot of ands here. Suggest changing to "professionals, placing"
• The "Montreal team" is the Montreal Bulldogs.
• "Baz O'Meara claimed he was ineligible to play due to" should we change it to "play as an amateur"?
• "re-joined the Ottawa Rough Riders" remove ottawa
• "before retiring from football" doesnt technically say he "retired"
• Why is he in the QB cat? Is that the flying wing?
• "He played the flying wing position" i dont see in ref four where it sayd that unless you are using PFA but thats not what is cited. Where did you get "back" from in the infobox"?
• "but left before the season start" The season had already started

I think that's all. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 08:11, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

 Closed with the nominator BeanieFan11's permission. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:15, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA

Copying notes from the GA review:

• Could you find anything on his high school career? Did he play football or anything?
  • Added a little bit and a quote.
• What's the Dominion Championships? The article makes it sound like going to the Olympics is a downgrade.
  • Looks like it might have been the national championship? Should I try to add that in with a source? I did re-word it a bit.
    • It would probably be helpful to explain what it is if possible? Do you think it's worthy of a quick stub? ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 20:21, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
      • @WikiOriginal-9: I added a note explaining it (I don't feel like writing an article on it right now...) – does that work? BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:37, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
• "competed against American and Austrian professionals" Those are both linked but Canadisn isn't linked in the lead and Americans is earlier in the body but not linked?
  • I removed the links.
• "professionals and placed " A lot of ands here. Suggest changing to "professionals, placing"
  • Changed.
• The "Montreal team" is the Montreal Bulldogs.
  • Added.
• "Baz O'Meara claimed he was ineligible to play due to" should we change it to "play as an amateur"?
  • Changed.
• "re-joined the Ottawa Rough Riders" remove ottawa
  • Removed.
• "before retiring from football" doesnt technically say he "retired"
  • Re-worded.
• Why is he in the QB cat? Is that the flying wing?
  • To be honest, I have no idea, lol. I removed it.
    • lol ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 20:21, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
• "He played the flying wing position" i dont see in ref four where it sayd that unless you are using PFA but thats not what is cited. Where did you get "back" from in the infobox"?
  • I cited PFA. Also changed 'back' to 'halfback', something that is mentioned in the article.
• "but left before the season start" The season had already started
  • Reworded.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:47, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

• @WikiOriginal-9: Responded to everything. BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:15, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

  That all looks good now. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 21:06, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

  @WikiOriginal-9: Nominated. BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:15, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Johnny Fripp/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: BeanieFan11 (talk · contribs) 21:15, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: WikiOriginal-9 (talk · contribs) 21:42, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

This is a follow up on my prior review. All points have now been addressed. Nice work! ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 21:42, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Launchballer talk 23:36, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that Johnny Fripp was "a bundle of football-toting dynamite"?

• Source: quote from Ottawa Citizen

• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/1939 Liechtenstein general election
• Comment: QPQ to be done within 24 hours.

Improved to Good Article status by BeanieFan11 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 264 past nominations.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:21, 24 October 2024 (UTC).

• Hi BeanieFan11, review follows: article promoted to GA on 17 October and (just!) nominated within 7 days; article is well written and sources look to be reliable; I didn't pick up on any concerns over paraphrasing (note that the Earwig score is thrown off by proper nouns and attributed quotes); hook fact is simple and effective and checks out to source cited; QPQ has been carried out. Looks fine to me - Dumelow (talk) 21:56, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

@BeanieFan11, Dumelow, and Kimikel: I have pulled this from prep 6 as there are already NFL hooks in queue 5 and preps 7, 2, and 4. I will put this back in the next prep 6. I haven't reviewed it myself.--Launchballer 11:20, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

Just FWIW, this is Canadian football rather than relating to the NFL – but I'm fine with it being delayed either way. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:02, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

Apologies, I should have pinged user:Hey man im josh earlier.--Launchballer 23:38, 16 November 2024 (UTC)