Talk:José Alencar

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Harfarhs in topic Economic beliefs


Untitled

edit

Actually, there is no law, but rather a common law interpretation of constitutional rights that refusal to take the paternity test after 3 subpoenas is admitted as evidence of paternity. The right not to deliver evidence against oneself is relativized when in shock with the child's right to paternity. I thought of ammending the bio to add that, but I thought it was somewhat irrelevant, so I decided to leave it here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.51.67.237 (talk) 11:48, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the input. When we say "Brazilian law", it includes principles not written into law, but widely accepted by the judicial system, such as that you speak of. Missionary (talk) 20:58, 31 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Brazilian Law 12.004/2009 about the refusal of undergoing a parental testing in Brazilian courts.

edit

The Brazilian Law 12.004/2009, valid since 29 July 2009, establishes that the refusal of undergoing a parental testing must be accepted as proof of paternity. Follow a link to an official site, published by Brazilian Presidency ([1]), and a link to an article of O Globo, a major newspaper in Brazil ([2]). 187.42.65.192 (talk) 19:52, 16 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

"The Strong"

edit

"José Alencar, the Strong". What??? Citation needed. 187.20.200.125 (talk) 01:55, 22 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on José Alencar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:39, 30 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on José Alencar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:54, 25 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Economic beliefs

edit
"..he argued in favor of lower taxes, especially indirect taxation over consumers"

This phrasing might mean either a) he sought a reduction in indirect taxes b) he sought a reduction in the overall tax burden and a shift from direct to indirect taxes. Given that his views are described as pro-business, b) sounds a little more likely — but if the passage is to remain in the article, a sourced clarification is required. Harfarhs (talk) 09:21, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply