Talk:Joseph Favre/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: No Great Shaker (talk · contribs) 16:21, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Review

1. Well written: the prose is clear and concise.
2. Well written: the spelling and grammar are correct.
3. Contains a short description which complies with recommendations.
4. Complies with the MOS guidelines for lead sections.
5. Complies with the MOS guidelines for article structure and layout.
6. Complies with the MOS guidelines for words to watch.
7. Complies with the MOS guidelines for writing about fiction – not applicable.
8. Complies with the MOS guidelines for list incorporation.
9. Complies with the MOS guidelines for use of quotations.
10. All statements are verifiable with inline citations provided.
11. All inline citations are from reliable sources, etc.
12. Contains a list of all references in accordance with the layout style guideline.
13. No original research.
14. No copyright violations or plagiarism.
15. Broad in its coverage but within scope and in summary style.
16. Neutral.
17. Stable.
18. Illustrated, if possible.
19. Images are at least fair use and do not breach copyright.

I'll be happy to do this review. Hope to provide some feedback soon. No Great Shaker (talk) 16:30, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Points to be considered

Hello, Asilvering. Hope you are well. I have just a few points, including two small changes I've already done.

• I think, per MOS:JOBTITLES, that "bishop of Orléans" should be capitalised as it always references Félix Dupanloup in his official capacity, though not in the generic sense when it is only "the bishop laughed". I have an open mind on this, however. What do you think?

• I wikilinked Valais as a canton only. I agree that countries like Switzerland should not be linked.

• I amended the quotation in the last years section. The reference is normally placed after the colon to precede the blockquote; and in this case it applies to both sentences.

And that is it. This is unquestionably a good article and it passes the review. The man was a culinary genius and I've got an appetite now, after reading the article. I'll do the necessary at WP:GA. Well done and all the best. No Great Shaker (talk) 12:37, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

@No Great Shaker Thanks very much! I see what you mean about the bishop title - I'll change that to capitalize it. -- asilvering (talk) 16:39, 26 February 2022 (UTC)