Talk:Joseph L. Cahall

Latest comment: 27 days ago by WikiOriginal-9 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Joseph L. Cahall/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: BeanieFan11 (talk · contribs) 01:54, 22 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: WikiOriginal-9 (talk · contribs) 05:55, 26 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
  • Lead needs expanded.
    • Expanded.
  • Changed cat 1800s births to 19th century births. 1800s is for the decade.
  • "taking the offices of Jacob Moore" What's that mean?
    • I'm not completely sure – removed that part.
  • What's a Levy Court?
    • Added a note – it was the county government.
  • "He joined the Sussex County bar" put "as well" after bar. I think that is needed there to show that was happening at the same time as the Levy Court thing. Otherwise, readers will think it is out of order.
    • Added.
  • "Delaware Constitutional Convention of 1896–97" Is there a link for any of that?
    • There should be, but no one has written an article for it... (on my long-term to-do list)
  • I'm confused. The infobox says 1905 to 1909 but the article says he was ousted in 1909??
  • "After having served as Secretary of State for four years, he retired" Who retired? Cahall or Bennett??
    • Cahall – changed.

That's all I think. Excellent research on this. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 05:55, 26 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.