| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editStarted with the page.Please add more informationTarijanel (talk) 06:18, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:07, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:08, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Photos
edit
@Pbritti: you seem to categorically object to photograph changes by editors in this topic area. You've said in the past they were "highly photoshopped", and I'm not sure I understand that objection; it appears that, in this culture, it is customary to depict saints and leaders in highly stylized formats, a sort of iconography. The current dispute over the photo does not seem to turn on photo editing, however. What is your objection to this photo? Elizium23 (talk) 02:24, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
- The image is a photoshopped copyrighted image of a living person (so, unethical by BLP standards). Also, importantly, the image originates from a paid contributor who has already gotten blocked on one account. You can see more here. While perhaps "customary" in this culture, it is beyond inappropriate to include significantly manipulated images that were created for the purposes of promotion, particularly when the photoshopping is presented without any mention of manipulation. ~ Pbritti (talk) 02:30, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
- It should be noted that image was among those deleted in July when Esthappanos Bar Geevarghese's Commons contributions were nuked en masse. ~ Pbritti (talk) 02:31, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Elizium23: A week ago you requested additional detail regarding these images. A sockpuppet investigation confirmed the IP editors are working to add a paid contributor's images. A file deletion request have been opened on the Commons if you want to give your input. ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:58, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
- It should be noted that image was among those deleted in July when Esthappanos Bar Geevarghese's Commons contributions were nuked en masse. ~ Pbritti (talk) 02:31, 23 September 2022 (UTC)