Talk:Juan Martín del Potro

Retirement

Del Potro's retirement has not yet been confirmed with reliable sources stating that he only said it was likely. Per WP:CRYSTALBALL the article's infobox should not add a year or date of retirement until it's either been confirmed by himself or the ATP/ITF (you can find a list of players that have retired since 2015 here). --Bonoahx (talk) 12:55, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Bonoahx, yes, it is not confirmed that he will not retire just yet. He also accepted another Wild Card (WC) for the 2022 Rio Open, however, we need 3+ reliable sources containing that del Potro has retired. Severestorm28 20:37, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Yes, del Potro's retirement is still not confirmed by reliable sources or himself or the ATP. 592Franklin704 (talk) 16:02, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

GA Reassessment

Juan Martín del Potro

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Kept. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:15, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

A massive amount of uncited material, including quotes, statistics, and much else; the article is also probably too unfocused at ~11500 words. Thus, violating criteria 2b) and 3b). ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:59, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

Delist. At several places, it goes on for several long paragraphs without a single reference. Getting the sourcing in order would require a lot of effort. Phlsph7 (talk) 13:30, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

Per WP:GA/R "Editors should prioritize bringing an article up to standard above delisting."--Wolbo (talk) 00:49, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Improve. It seems the lack of citations is concentrated in the latter years of his career. It should be possible with a bit of effort to address that shortcoming. Would like to try to do that before the article gets delisted.--Wolbo (talk) 00:53, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for starting to improve the article Wolbo; it'll be a large task but greatly appreciated. Please note here when you think you're finished, or can't continue (no prejudice against the latter). ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:58, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

AirshipJungleman29, it will probably take a few weeks and I will report here on the outcome.--Wolbo (talk) 19:13, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi Wolbo, you've done an excellent job but there are still significant uncited sections. Any chance that you could fix them? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:25, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

AirshipJungleman29, sure. Most of the work has been done but a few areas still need attention. Have also tidied up the wording where needed and will do a full scan of the article at the end. Took a bit more time than expected but should be done by the end of the month at the latest.--Wolbo (talk) 17:52, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi Wolbo, any update? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:34, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi AirshipJungleman29, added more references. Don't see any significant deficiencies anymore. Also tidied up wording a bit more and removed some trivial content in a few places.--Wolbo (talk) 21:23, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.