Talk:Judaism and abortion

Latest comment: 7 months ago by Awolin2002 in topic "Source" material

Conspiracy theories

edit

In order to oppose conspiracy theories, it would appear useful to clarify what is the Jewish position on Gentile abortion. This is because there are raving antisemites out there that claim that Jews are leading pro-abortion advocates and that it is a moral duty for Jews to reduce the Gentile population. Is there a substantial difference between a Gentile abortion and a Jewish abortion ? (cf [1]) ADM (talk) 09:21, 31 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Possible material to be included

edit

I've been moving some of the extensive background material in History of early Christian thought on abortion to more appropriate articles, and while this article would seem to be the most appropriate place for this paragraph, I'm not sure where/if to include it because I lack the context to know how it would fit into the current article. Here is the text:

Regarding Jewish ideas on the subject of abortion, Theologian Odd Bakke says that Jewish discussion generally centered around two schools of thought:

The Alexandrian school, with a minority in the Palestinian school, held that the fetus acquired the juridical status of a human person at one particular point in time, while the Palestinian majority held that the fetus and the mother were one, so that the fetus on its own had no legal existence. The latter point of view entailed that abortion was allowed, or indeed even demanded, in certain situations. We must, however, emphasize that the Palestinian school discussed abortion almost exclusively in relation to "the problem of the legal and cultic status of the fetus, especially in relation to miscarriages and certain necessary (and usually late) abortions. Abortions in the early stages of pregnancy, 'on demand' or as a means of birth control 'is very likely not even contemplated in the Mishnaic law.'"

Source: Odd Magne Bakke, When children became people: the birth of childhood in early Christianity, p. 111

I'm not sure if the Alexandrian school is the one for which there exists an article or if Bakke is referring to something different, nor do I know what the Palestinian school is supposed to be. Presumably this would go in the "early rabbinic Judaism" section, but beyond that, I don't really know what to do with it. Roscelese (talkcontribs) 05:47, 12 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Judaism and abortion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:22, 28 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Karaite Jewish views

edit

Never in the Jewish Virtual Library article is there any mention of how Karaites consider Exodus 21:22 to apply to both mother and child.-70.190.102.49 (talk) 21:41, 22 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

The article does mention Karaite commentators: "Philo (Spec., 3:108) specifically prescribes the imposition of the death penalty for causing an abortion, and the text is likewise construed in the Samaritan Targum and by a substantial number of Karaite commentators." Yaakovaryeh (talk) 02:58, 5 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Bitter Waters Ordeal

edit

The bible does include an intentional abortion by conspiracy of the husband and clergy in Ordeal_of_the_bitter_water. Why isn't this included in this article?Vampromero (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:41, 23 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Judaism and abortion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:50, 2 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Do not change direct quotes

edit

Hello @Animal lover 666: since we are working with direct quotes from actual translations and not our personal interpretations, we need to represent what the sources say. Thanks. Elizium23 (talk) 13:58, 8 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Elizium23:Where is this specific translation from? The sourcing I saw is to the original Hebrew, which I understand. My correction is closer to the actual meaning of the Hebrew. Animal lover 666 (talk) 16:34, 8 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
Animal lover 666, it was actually quite poor grammar and a transparent attempt to be politically correct rather than faithful to the source material. Elizium23 (talk) 16:39, 8 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
The Hebrew word אדם generally means either person, regardless of gender, or the name of the first person, who happened to be male. It's never used as a generic for male people as opposed to female, that would be איש. Animal lover 666 (talk) 16:42, 8 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
Animal lover 666, it is commonly understood by speakers of English that "man" and "mankind", etc. is a generic term for human persons of both sexes. This has been upheld constantly by usage and prescription for hundreds of years. Elizium23 (talk) 16:44, 8 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

I don't know what a c-class article is, but this is C- class, no one apart from an expert can understand it

edit

I don't know what a c-class article is, but this is C- class, no one apart from an expert can understand it

107.3.134.101 (talk) 21:50, 23 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Source" material

edit

Biblical sources and rabbinic sources are not separate in Jewish thought. These two sections need to be combined and altered. In addition, Biblical sources should be changed to reflect the Torah and Judaism, not within an Christian lens. Awolin2002 (talk) 15:33, 5 April 2024 (UTC)Reply