Talk:Just to Get a Rep
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Their edits to this article were last checked for neutrality on 14-05-2019.
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Just to Get a Rep. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140606231544/http://accidental.tv/rep.php to http://accidental.tv/rep.php
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://accidental.tv/news9.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:56, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
Notability update
editA previous editor marked for deletion, saying "No major reviews or press coverage, no awards". I removed the warnings, as per below:
However, as is clearly noted in the page's references (added in July 2014), the film was reviewed in print editions of one of France's most important newspapers, Le Monde, and in Scotland's leading entertainment magazine, The List (magazine) (both considered major press coverage in Europe). It was also reviewed in regional print newspapers and magazines around the world (including front page of Columbia Missourian) and many online publications. Since the film initially came out in 2004, a lot of this press is not currently digitized online.
The film continued to be notable more than a decade later - in 2014-2015 it was featured in the marquee of Hulu's homepage by Hulu's curation staff.