This article is within the scope of WikiProject Textile Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of textile arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Textile ArtsWikipedia:WikiProject Textile ArtsTemplate:WikiProject Textile ArtsTextile Arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Lots of information- good looking page, but overall, just a bit like an advert for Bangladeshi jute. Given that according to the table in it India produces more, I removed the unreferenced statement that the best source is the mostly Bangladeshi delta; it just added up wrong to me.
IceDragon64 (talk) 00:57, 23 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
it says in the intro "The primary source of the fiber is Corchorus olitorius, but such fiber is considered inferior to that derived from Corchorus capsularis." olitorius being tossa jute and capsularis being white jute. later under the tossa jute section it says that tossa jute is softer, silkier and stronger than white jute. this part however seems to have no citations. so how exactly is Tossa jute inferior to white jute? Tomteayh (talk) 05:06, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Jutes which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot07:02, 9 June 2024 (UTC)Reply