Talk:K-3 (Kansas highway)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:K-3 (Kansas highway)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 17:20, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   • In the route description, you begin two consecutive sentences with "North of". One of these should be changed.

     Yeah, I used that transition too often. Fixed.

   • The sentence "After this intersection, the highway crosses the Little Osage River, then leaves Bourbon County and enters Linn County." sounds awkward. I would remove the mention of leaving Bourbon County because by stating it is entering Linn County, you are already implying it is leaving the previous county mentioned.

     Rewritten.

   • "By 1950, the portion of K-3 in Crawford County had been paved, leaving the remainder of the route yet to be improved" I don't see the need for the rest of the sentence after the comma since that is already implied.

     I guess that is pretty redundant. Axed.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Can some more historical details be added to the lead?

   Did the best I can. There's not the greatest amount of history on this.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

I will place the article on hold for a few small fixes to be made. Dough4872 17:26, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

I believe I have addressed all of your issues. TCN7JM 20:32, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

I will now pass the article. Dough4872 21:09, 3 May 2013 (UTC)