Talk:K-95 (Kansas highway)

Latest comment: 3 years ago by 420Traveler in topic GA Review
Good articleK-95 (Kansas highway) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 10, 2021Good article nomineeNot listed
September 4, 2021Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article


GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:K-95 (Kansas highway)/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 21:14, 3 September 2021 (UTC)Reply


Comments

  • "6.591-mile-long (10.607" bit over precise.
  Fixed -420Traveler (talk) 15:09, 4 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "in a July 27, 1966 resolution" comma after 1966.
  Fixed -420Traveler (talk) 15:09, 4 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "a May 10, 1967 resolution" likewise.
  Fixed -420Traveler (talk) 15:09, 4 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "and crosses Ladder Creek. The " overlinked.
  Fixed -420Traveler (talk) 15:09, 4 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "highways soon intersects" singular?
  Fixed -420Traveler (talk) 15:09, 4 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "area of the Battle of Punished Woman's Fork, the" overlinked.
  Fixed -420Traveler (talk) 15:09, 4 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "May 10, 1967 resolution" comma.
  Fixed -420Traveler (talk) 15:09, 4 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "became K-95.[15] K-95 first" repetitive.
  Fixed -420Traveler (talk) 15:09, 4 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

That's all I have for now. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 09:59, 4 September 2021 (UTC)Reply