Talk:FK Radnički 1923

article title

I would like to set the correct article name for this article as a article was just created and I was trying to help out but don't know much about the team. What is the more commonly known version, it seems to me the current (KFK Radnički Kragujevac) is definitely wrong, and I see two options KFK Radnički or FK Radnički Kragujevac? Somehow to me the later seems the better option? // Laughing Man 05:16, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Logo

Can someone add the FK Radnički Kragujevac logo? The current logo displayed is the old club logo. Nikola89 17:38, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Discussion about merging FK Šumadija 1903 article into here

I saw the tag about merging the FK Šumadija 1903 article into this one. The mentioned club did merge with FK Radnički Kragujevac to form this new club, but, since this article is the continuation of the Radnički one, where all the text about the history is from Radnički, it would be good to leave the other, FK Šumadija 1903, article to talk about the history of that club. If we merged them here, we would have two club histories in only one article (this one). The way the things are now is quite O´right. The Radnički was way bigger club than Šumadija, and also played in the top league, while Sumadija never. So, in a way, this new club is somehow a "continuation" of Radnički, so it is good to have this article centered into Radnicki, and leave the other article (Sumadija 1903) exclusively to write about the history of that minor club. We should mention there that the club was merged in 2009 into FK Sumadija Radnicki, and categorise it as "defunct". So, I agree the way things are wright now: This new club article contains the history of Radnicki, and we leave the Sumadija 1903 article for having there written the history of that club. FkpCascais (talk) 06:15, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

I will remove the merge template as the cluibs have followed separate paths, so merge would not be the indicated thing to do. FkpCascais (talk) 20:31, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on FK Radnički 1923

Cyberbot II has detected links on FK Radnički 1923 which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• https://bibliotekafudbala.shutterfly.com/biblioteka/1054#1046

  Triggered by \bshutterfly\.com\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:06, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on FK Radnički 1923

Cyberbot II has detected links on FK Radnički 1923 which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• https://bibliotekafudbala.shutterfly.com/biblioteka/1054#1046

  Triggered by \bshutterfly\.com\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:32, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on FK Radnički 1923. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120412001819/http://www.fkradnicki.com/o_klubu/stadion/istorija/ to http://www.fkradnicki.com/o_klubu/stadion/istorija/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120412001819/http://www.fkradnicki.com/o_klubu/stadion/istorija/ to http://www.fkradnicki.com/o_klubu/stadion/istorija/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:36, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 12 November 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: No consensus. (non-admin closure) Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:34, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

---

• FK Radnički 1923 → FK Radnički Kragujevac – The club has changed its name numerous times, especially in the last 20 years (KFK Radnički, FK Šumadija Radnički 1923, FK Radnički 1923, etc.), but is commonly, and historically, referred to as FK Radnički Kragujevac. Also, the current name is ambiguous since there is another Radnički, founded the same year, that has the "1923" part displayed on its logo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:9000:6E0E:7FFD:F0D7:BB84:3506:914E (talk) 23:40, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
• Comment I've removed the categories from this RM, as categories are not moved per the RM process (WP:CFD is the place to rename categories). Iffy★Chat -- 09:24, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 09:28, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

• Oppose - team is shown as 'FK Radnički 1923' on their official website and 'FK Radnički 1923 Kragujevac' on Soccerway. There is no ambiguity on article titles based on similar images in the infobox, ridiculous. GiantSnowman 09:31, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.