Talk:Kačikol

No argumet

No argumet!!! please dont inteprete the documents

Sombody have putit this Kosovo place in Serbia stub or category or template here with out argumet. We dont have a argumet that Kosovo is part of S/M. We have tha Constitution of this countrie but we have the rez. 1244 wich is more importen for the Wikipedia and is saying that Kosovo it is a part of Yougoslavia and is prototoriat of UN. Till we dont have a clearly argument from UN, aricel about Kosovo must be out of this stub or category or template. Pleas dont make the discution with intepretation or the Law wich are not accordin to 1244. Everybodoy can do that but that is nothing for Wikipedia.--Hipi Zhdripi 04:57, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion, hangon

The presented reason is false, this village is for sure in Kosovo. Thank you. kedadial 15:11, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

You dont have any arguments, or references. --Tadija (talk) 15:36, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Here is a public tender (in Albanian btw) from the Muncipality of Pristina which is about a road to be built, which connects the villages of Keqekolla and Ballaban. Thank you. kedadial 15:50, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Name

The name should be in the most common language of the country/region/province it is located in, which is Kosovo. I am going to request that it be moved back.--TM 19:36, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Kosovo is disputed country/region/province, so per old WP:MOSKOS and per all other Kosovo-related articles, it was reverted. --Tadija (talk) 20:24, 8 February 2010 (UTC)