Talk:Kaitlin Bennett

Latest comment: 1 month ago by Bronx Langford in topic Bing/Bong ?

The article says conservative activist, should that be changed to right-wing or far-right?

edit

ˆˆˆ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.7.235.93 (talkcontribs) 19:10, 8 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Liberty Hangout should no longer be considered "libertarian"

edit

Their public political opinions for some time have been discernably non-libertarian, but as of (at least) August 31, 2021, they are explicitly anti-libertarian:

https://twitter.com/LibertyHangout/status/1432566216128966659

They have in their own words embraced an authoritarian Catholicism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.73.22.226 (talkcontribs) 03:46, 10 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Infobox image changed

edit

The original image could be construed as intentionally unflattering. I inserted the image from Commons, along with a link to Commons at the bottom. Outdatedpizza (talk) 08:44, 26 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Reverted a change. The previous image is so unflattering it could be considered a BLP violation.Outdatedpizza (talk) 02:00, 28 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Can this be done again and have the display picture changed? It appears the same unflattering photo is being used again, what a coincidence... /sarcasm 142.186.16.25 (talk) 01:17, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Pants shitting incident"

edit

Should there be a section dedicated to this alleged incident and how it is often used against her in internet discussions? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C8:8B16:2D01:5419:E776:6CA4:CCB2 (talk) 09:51, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

There is already a paragraph on it.Outdatedpizza (talk) 22:50, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
It honestly shouldn't be relevant, social media gossip isn't what Wikipedia should involve. The rumor/incident has nothing to do with her relevance (to be clear it's her advocacy for gun rights). And what was thrown at her doesn't need to be explained either, just the fact items were thrown is fine enough, everything thrown at someone in any event doesn't need an explanation as to why it's one item and not another. 142.186.16.25 (talk) 01:20, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
As this person has been met with protesters who chant things about the incident, a short description of the event is justified to explain the protests. ValarianB (talk) 13:01, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
But the protests weren't due to the "event" so that's honestly irrelevant. The protest is about her political beliefs but the protesters just use the event as an ad-hom attack to use as additional verbal ammunition. 142.186.88.120 (talk) 22:32, 24 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

conversion to Christianity?

edit

the citation does not support the assertion that Bennett was non-Christian before marriage, and that theirs was a Catholic wedding. i read though the cited source several times and amidst the gay-baiting that distractify.com does of her husband, i can see no mention of his religious denomination. ValarianB (talk) 16:25, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Bing/Bong ?

edit

C'mon guys this is obvious satire on what she sees as 'woke pronouns' she actually does not use pronounce to refer to herself... i propose to remove it since this isnt her actual pronouns LuanLoud (talk) 15:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

She's never confirmed those aren't her pronouns though... Bronx Langford (talk) 16:18, 16 September 2024 (UTC)Reply