Talk:Kalloor
Latest comment: 5 months ago by Xaosflux in topic Fully protected edit request 10 June 2024
| ||||||||||
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hoax
editThe original article was a straight hoax. Later additions have muddied the waters, but what we have is a completely unsourced article, with a few small and insignificant details which are verifiable, but substantially a mixture of certainly false content and unverifiable, probably false information. In short, substantially a hoax. JBW (talk) 20:59, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Fully protected edit request 10 June 2024
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add the following redirect categorizations: {{R fully protected}} and {{R from mispelling}}. mwwv converse∫edits 17:34, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- I don't see why it's a misspelling — DaxServer (t·m·e·c) 20:34, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Eh, i'm going off of the fact it's a misspelling due to a !vote someone made in the deletion discussion. mwwv converse∫edits 22:53, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Do you think it is an appropriate redirect at all? Why or why not? — xaosflux Talk 18:44, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Done doing it on the feasible basis that if a reader ended up here, it is because they are looking for an article under the other spelling. — xaosflux Talk 15:49, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
