Talk:Kalyan Mukherjea

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Article neutrality

edit

This is a well written article, however certain terms used in the article are not neutral. An easy example is the lead sentence: "..an unsung maestro..". That is not neutral and furthermore it makes his notability questionable. The rest of the article has many of these same flowery prose regarding this musician's abilities. These need to be removed or rewritten to better fit the policies of the Wikipedia project ( WP:NPOV ). Please don't remove the tag without discussion or editing the article for neutrality. Thanks. ju66l3r (talk) 21:55, 20 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ju66l3r: We're working on this article. I agree with you that the tone of this article needs to be more crisp and less eulogistic. Can you hold on and not do anything further (such as recommend deletion) until I get back in an hour or so? Regards, Arnab —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arnabchakrabarty1 (talkcontribs) 21:56, 20 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
This article has shown significant improvement and better meets the style guide for wikipedia. Be careful to always be the one that removes another's tags for clean-up on an article. Often we are not the best judge for whether our actions have improved the article fully or enough to satisfy the reason for having been tagged in the first place. If the tag was accompanied by discussion on the article's talk page, then the original editor who tagged the article will likely be back to appraise the changes and will either remove the tag or comment on why further revision might be necessary. Being the one whose content was tagged and then removing the tag, even if you did fully fix the problem, often appears to be the action of someone who has a desire to hide something that was being tagged for good reason to begin with. It better strengthens the article to have someone else remove the tag or wait a longer time to remove it yourself after others will have had time to consider if the tag is any longer appropriate. ju66l3r (talk) 18:53, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
I think I was the one who removed the tags. Guess you're right I should have waited for you to remove them. Could I ask you to overlook things just this once as the acts of a Wikipedia noob who'll sure know better the next time? :) Abhikmajumdar (talk) 17:01, 26 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kalyan Mukherjea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:37, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply