Talk:Kapil Sharma

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Rock Stone Gold Castle in topic Vandalised

Wrong photo

edit

The profile photo is not of kapil sharma — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.196.179.33 (talk) 11:33, 9 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Removed, thank you for pointing this out. Tolly4bolly 11:37, 9 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 13 October 2021

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Unanimous support for the move and pageviews show the comedian as the primary topic. That the RM was started by a banned user seems irrelevant. An AfD can be started for the DAB as soon as the move is complete. (non-admin closure) VR talk 09:02, 31 October 2021 (UTC)Reply


– No need to disambiguish, he is very far more popular than other one, see page views PMGSMP (talk) 18:10, 13 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Update: PMGSMP has been blocked. signed, Iflaq (talk) 16:15, 21 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Instead of putting the disambig page on AfD, I have opted to give notice of the WP:ONEOTHER issue, allowing them time to find additional entries.VR talk 09:15, 31 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Oops, just saw this. Oh well! --В²C 04:29, 2 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Kapil Sharma (disambiguation) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kapil Sharma (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kapil Sharma (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

--В²C 04:29, 2 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 16 January 2023

edit

Paragraph 2 of the controversies section contains the sentence "It angard people." The spelling should be corrected and it should be specified who was angered. Webcrawler2002 (talk) 19:27, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Done. --Mvqr (talk) 16:08, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Vandalised

edit

A IP user here [1] vandalised this page, he should be banned from editing for disruption the wp. Rock Stone Gold Castle (talk) 10:25, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply