Talk:Karadžić

Anthroponymy Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthroponymyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthroponymyTemplate:WikiProject AnthroponymyAnthroponymy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Serbia

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Montenegro

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montenegro, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Montenegro on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontenegroWikipedia:WikiProject MontenegroTemplate:WikiProject MontenegroMontenegro articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Bosnia and Herzegovina

	Bosnia and Herzegovina portal Karadžić is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Bosnia and HerzegovinaWikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaTemplate:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaBosnia and Herzegovina articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 16 October 2020

Latest comment: 3 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) BegbertBiggs (talk) 16:16, 23 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Karadžić → Karadžić (surname) – The overwhelming WP:PRIMARYTOPIC of this surname is without doubt Radovan Karadžić. (t · c) buidhe 15:00, 16 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Comment: The pageviews for Radovan Karadzic are more than twice the rest of these articles put together. The NGRAMS result for English-language sources shows a dramatic spike during Radovan Karadzic's main activity[1] Primary redirect from surnames is used in other cases, such as Heydrich -> Reinhard Heydrich, with others listed at Heydrich (surname). (t · c) buidhe 15:00, 16 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
Go ahead, without any further ado, actually---౪ Santa ౪^99° 08:03, 17 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ahem, I don't actually think this is a correct interpretation of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. For one, it's easy to claim that Vuk Karadžić probably has more long-term significance than the politician. Likewise, some of us generally prefer to have surname articles instead of short-circuiting navigation where people aren't actually mononymously known under the surname. In general, with just a single person chiming in in a week's time, I think a more appropriate solution would have been to relist it to gather a clearer consensus. I'm now going to revert this, and see if anyone notices. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 19:21, 31 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Obviously if nobody notices in another week or a month, anyone should feel free to move it either way, but further discussions should be accompanied with asking around for more input. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 19:28, 31 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic