Talk:Karen Carter Peterson

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Karen Carter Peterson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130609193808/http://www.wwltv.com/news/Carter-Peterson-Sticking-By-Statement---209728271.html to http://www.wwltv.com/news/Carter-Peterson-Sticking-By-Statement---209728271.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/capital/index.ssf?%2Fbase%2Fnews-7%2F1245129759222170.xml&coll=1
• Added archive https://archive.is/20140410013412/http://www.thetowntalk.com/article/DG/20130501/NEWS01/130501010 to http://www.thetowntalk.com/article/DG/20130501/NEWS01/130501010
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061109031256/http://nationalatlas.gov/printable/images/preview/congdist/LA02_109.gif to http://www.nationalatlas.gov/printable/images/preview/congdist/la02_109.gif
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060629205957/http://www.dlc.org/ndol_ci.cfm?kaid=104&subid=115&contentid=253087 to http://www.dlc.org/ndol_ci.cfm?contentid=253087&kaid=104&subid=115
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930181437/http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/frontpage/index.ssf?%2Fbase%2Fnews-6%2F116097662579050.xml&coll=1 to http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/frontpage/index.ssf?%2Fbase%2Fnews-6%2F116097662579050.xml&coll=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:16, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Campaign misrepresentation

The edit that was removed from this article was similar to what I'd posted but which was removed from the Troy Carter article. I'd written on that article'S Talk page:

This edit is solid - It may be long, but it's well documented and important

Please read the source article. The campaign ad was a compendium of falsifications.Activist (talk) 23:40, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Takj This contention by TC wasn't a "lie." It was an actual lie. Thanks for reverting. Activist (talk) 23:40, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

User Qba0202:tALK Your edit needs to be supported by the sources you quote. There is no mention of the specifics in the bill in which the vote was missed. There is no discussion of, i.e., "progressive" The broken English in your edit makes it difficult to understand. You can get a free English grammar program (i.e. "grammarly.com") to assist with this problem. You're improperly filling out the citations and you're not seeming to recognize your mistakes in the previews if you are previewing your edits. Activist (talk) 15:13, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Qba0202:talk, Talk(talk), (talk), You've been reverted by two different editors about the problems with your edits. You can't post your opinions, on your own initiative that are not found in your sources. I've suggested how you might remedy your problems with making coherent edits in English, but you've persisted, even in your repeating errors in the posting of garbled citations. Przestań to robić! Activist (talk) 22:32, 19 April 2021 (UTC)