Talk:Karnaphuli

Copyvio deleted from article

(It was originally moved here but I am now deleting it as copy vio.) Material deleted from article was copyvio from this site:[1]. Material needs to be reworded and not copied from the source. Sincerely, Mattisse 14:14, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on Karnaphuli River

Cyberbot II has detected links on Karnaphuli River which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://social.yourstory.com/2015/07/ganga-river-dolphin/

  Triggered by \byourstory\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:32, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to merge. Chhandama (talk) 02:55, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

---

• Aren't the Khawthlangtuipui River and Karnaphuli River the same river, the name being different on the Indian and Bangladeshi sides of the border? In such situations, doesn't Wikipedia normally have just a single article (like in the case of the Danube, for instance)? I propose that Khawthlangtuipui River be merged into Karnaphuli River. I think that a merged article will convey a more complete picture of the river, without becoming unwieldy in size. Worldbruce (talk) 06:33, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

• Support: I support the merger of Khawthlangtuipui River into Karnaphuli River --Ragib (talk) 21:20, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

• Not agrred. Because the bangladeshi part do not known as Khawthlangtuipui River and Indian part as Karnaphuli River like Ganga and padma the same river with two different name in two borders. ferdous ^TM 14:15, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

• Oppose: Different name would result in dispute over which name to use.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 08:14, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

• Support: A single river should really have only one article. Possible disputes should not be a factor in the decision...Jokulhlaup (talk) 08:36, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.