This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is part of WikiProject Deaf, the WikiProject which seeks to improve articles relating to all aspects of deaf-related and Deaf culture. For the Project guidelines, see the project page or talk page.DeafWikipedia:WikiProject DeafTemplate:WikiProject Deafdeaf articles
Yes: thousands of articles from reliable sources (including every single reference here), all of his official performance credits, and his social media profile. It's clearly not a typo. – Rhain☔ (he/him)22:04, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
I'mnot—not that it matters, since that wasn't the point of my comment anyway. The point still stands, whether it's thousands of articles or just the dozen used here. – Rhain☔ (he/him)07:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
So, you're now changing your claim: (i) 'thousands of articles' has now become a Google search result, and (ii) your point now isn't your original point. Consistency isn't your strong suit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.216.106.183 (talk) 09:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Believe it or not, the Google search results largely consist of those thousands of articles, so that claim remains true. And my original comment wasn't about the number of articles—that was just evidence to support my point, which is that his name is, in fact, spelled "Keivonn". I guess you would have known that if you'd taken as much time reading the sources as you did arguing a tangential point here. – Rhain☔ (he/him)23:51, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
'Believe it or not, the Google search results largely consist of those thousands of articles' Clearly you don't understand Google search results. Just as you don't understand the concept of the magnitude of numbers.
Rather notably you have now dropped 'reliable' from your claim of articles. No doubt as there not thousands of articles, let alone reliable ones.
'so that claim remains true.' Your original claim of 'thousands of reliable sources' remains unsupported.
'And my original comment wasn't about the number of articles' Well, you did as shown by your statement of 'thousands of articles from reliable sources'.
'that was just evidence to support my point' You making an unsupported claim is not evidence.
