Talk:Kevin Sanjaya Sukamuljo/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Lee Vilenski in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 14:26, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply


Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs)

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Immediate Failures

edit
  • It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria -
  • It contains copyright infringements -
  • It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}). -
  • It is not stable due to edit warring on the page. -
edit
Remove instagram link, ref #91 is sufficient as a reliable source. Stvbastian (talk) 23:07, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Prose

edit

Lede

edit
Done. Stvbastian (talk) 23:21, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Done: Move refs to the body. Stvbastian (talk) 23:21, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
He plays for PB Djarum, and has been a member of the club since 2007. Is it ok? Stvbastian (talk) 23:21, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
I only added some important tournaments that the player won. Stvbastian (talk) 23:21, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Done Stvbastian (talk) 23:21, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Re-edit. Stvbastian (talk) 23:21, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Linking to Despicable Me (film). Stvbastian (talk) 23:21, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Re-edit. I just changed the sentence to a new statement. Stvbastian (talk) 23:21, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

General

edit
Done. Stvbastian (talk) 08:42, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Done. Stvbastian (talk) 08:42, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Done. Stvbastian (talk) 08:42, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Actualy tht image was taken in 2017, so i moved tht to 2017 section. Stvbastian (talk) 20:54, 15 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Done. Stvbastian (talk) 08:42, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Lowercase to future athlete. "future athlete" in this part is just like mvp. Stvbastian (talk) 08:42, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Add refs. Stvbastian (talk) 08:42, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Here Indonesia had to settle for silver, losing the final 2 matches to 3 against jubilant, first time winner Denmark. - they don't "settle for silver", they won the silver medal. We also shouldn't be saying "jubilant". Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 15:00, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Done. Stvbastian (talk) 08:42, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Add 2018 section Stvbastian (talk) 20:54, 15 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Yes, i think its ok, since most of badminton related articles used tht images. Stvbastian (talk) 20:54, 15 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Since the players officially represents that country, i think the use of flag icons may be relevant without defining the flags. Stvbastian (talk) 20:54, 15 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
The tables that are listed in achievements section are the conclusions of the career section which already have sources. All the information data from achievements section also can be found in external link. Stvbastian (talk) 08:42, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
I think it's ok, just like the other good article pages Andy Murray and Roger Federer. Stvbastian (talk) 08:42, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
The performance timeline are the conclusions of the career section which already have sources. All the information data from performance timeline section also can be found in external link. Stvbastian (talk) 08:42, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Since the h2h records always shown on the screen at the BWF tv before the matches begin, i think this stats is important. Stvbastian (talk) 18:29, 16 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Added some ALTtext for the images. Stvbastian (talk) 20:54, 15 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Review meta comments

edit