Talk:Khammam

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 49.204.27.89 in topic Name

Khammam town and district

edit

Looks like district information is mixed up with town .

This article needs cleanup . Pavithrans (talk) 10:33, 9 May 2009 (UTC).Reply

Population

edit

The population which is above 2 lakhs says that its taken from 2006 data which is quite surprising as there is 2001 and currently 2011 census . Was there a census in between ? Khammam population as per 2001 census is 1,98,620 [1]

1. http://www.censusindia.gov.in/towns/ap_towns.pdf --Pavithrans (talk) 14:31, 21 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Name

edit

The old name was "Kammamettu" or "Kammamet" Evidences are given.Kumarrao (talk) 17:34, 28 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

The original name was Kamma Mettu as evidenced by six citations from 19th century books. It is prudent to accept historical truths. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.204.27.89 (talk) 14:30, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Needs more cleanup

edit

I have performed some reorganisation and cleaned up some parts of the article . But the article as of whole needs a lot of cleanup .--Pavithrans (talk) 12:24, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit
 

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 02:50, 16 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Khammam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:42, 10 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

KT Hub

edit

Hey I am willing to add about KT Hub in khammam which will be established soon which mean IT incubation centre. Vikas Konaparthi (talk) 13:14, 14 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add sources.--Vin09(talk) 05:58, 15 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Etymology

edit

The original name of Khammam was Kammamettu as evidenced from the records of British India and Christian missionaries. Proper citations were provided. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Polumetta (talkcontribs) 16:09, 7 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Oh, I didn't know that Telugu was the native language of the British and Christian missionaries. Telangana state government has to learn Telugu from them, I suppose? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 16:41, 7 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
I am amazed at the logic of your argument. Wikipedia has some very "capable" administrators. Hail Wiki.Polumetta (talk) 17:42, 18 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
The Edits were not disruptive but backed by reputed authors. That appear disruptive to stupid scoundrels who pose as administrators. Pity! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.196.2.234 (talk) 17:47, 18 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
Why don't you hot shots provide full citations and quotes then? And, why is the history provided by the Telangana government being deleted? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 17:52, 18 May 2020 (UTC)Reply