Talk:Khanna Paper Mills
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Contested deletion
editThis article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) --203.122.33.125 (talk) 12:11, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Contested deletion
editThis article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... i think herein this article i am talking about a paper mill that is considered one of the largest, in fact one of the 10 largest paper mills in India. I have read extensively about this mill and believe it needs to be here on Wikipedia. As of now, i have put up the introduction content backed up by highly reliable sources including Business Standard and Bloomberg. In the days to come, i intend to develop this article further. The mill has even been mentioned in the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_paper_mills throughout the paragraph i have tried to keep the language neutral and has backed up the facts with reliable sources. I believe the page has to be here, and should not be considered for speedy deletion --Dr. Dabby (talk) 12:23, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Contested deletion
editThis article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... 1) this page is about a paper mill of India that has been in existence for decades - it's one of the top 10 paper mills in India. we the wikipedians love to read about big companies. Apple, Microsoft, Tata, Infosys, all companies are here on wikipedia, and we don't mind reading about them, about how they're impacting the world around us. Khanna Paper Mills is kind of titanic in Indian paper industry. So i believe it has to be here on Wikipedia.
2) Last couple of days, i have been reading about this company, its story, its growth, and i intend to develop this page further in the days to come. And i would need guidance from the expert wikipedia moderators to better shape it. Deleting it right away won't do justice to this page, to our community.
3) whatever introductory content that i have placed on the page has been backed up by some very reliable sources which include Bloomberg and Business Standard. And i have tried my best to keep the tone neutral.
I request you all to give this page a chance. It has the potential to grow in to a beautiful wikipedia page. Thank you --Dr. Dabby (talk) 13:33, 28 November 2016 (UTC)