Talk:Kikata kingdom
Latest comment: 8 months ago by Kpbolumbu in topic Hinduphobic article
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 18:29, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Could the term ‘Kikata’ be a mispronunciation of the word ‘Kirata’?
editThe only reason I think this way is because they’re said to be non-aryan. In Ancient India, non-aryans mostly consisted of Kiratas, Khasas, Kols and Dravidians. Gamerboy290f2 (talk) 14:28, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- They are saying the kikatas are non-indo-aryans but the names appear to be in the aryabhasha. Kpbolumbu (talk) 16:26, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- The kikatas lived from 1700 bce to 1300bce but vedic era started in 1500 bce according to them
Propaganda
editthe text shows a different date from the one shown in the picture. Such mistakes cannot be avoided if one is hellbent to create a narrative for leftist propaganda Kpbolumbu (talk) 16:23, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Hinduphobic article
editHinduphobic article in its entirety Kpbolumbu (talk) 16:50, 19 February 2024 (UTC)