Talk:Kim Il Sung and Kim Jong Il badges/GA1
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: WPCW (talk · contribs) 20:05, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
The review of the article was at the time and date displayed at the end of the review. The review followed the Wikipedia good article criteria.
Well written
The article is appropriately structured, concise, and easily readable. The spelling and grammar in it are correct. The contents and format of the article are compliant with the Wikipedia manual of style.
Verifiable with no original research
The citations placed in the text support the facts and statements, and the sources included in an appropriate reference list. The sources for the article are from credible sources, predominantly academic books. The books are referenced correctly, including the page number. The links for electronic sources were checked and correctly working.
The article does not include any original research. When the text was checked using anti-plagiarism software, it did not find any plagiarism.
Broad in coverage
The reviewer had no previous knowledge of the topic and found the article sufficient to understand it. To a non-expert, there were no obvious issues about the breadth of coverage of the topic.
Neutral
The article takes an unbiased perspective on the topic, and additionally without any comments in the articles history or talk page concerning impartiality.
Stable
The article history and talk page do not show any evidence of ongoing debates about the articles text or editing wars.
Illustrated
The article illustrated with suitable captions underneath each photograph. A check of the photographs showed no issues about copyright infringements.
Summary
The article is fully compliant with the good article criteria without the need for any further amendments. WPCW (talk) 22:15, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you for conducting the review, WPCW.
- I'm happy to hear that the article has passed. I'm particularly content that you deemed it comprehensive yet written so that it's understood by someone without prior knowledge; this is in my opinion the key to good writing.
- I take pride in the fact that you found no issues that necessitated attention before you could pass the review. This is not always the case. If you find some errors or room for improvement later, just let me know. Thank you again! – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 00:18, 1 June 2018 (UTC)