Talk:Kim Yo Jong

Latest comment: 1 month ago by Bobby Cohn in topic Requested move 17 September 2024


edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kim Yo-jong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:13, 6 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kim Yo-jong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:48, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Photo

edit

Is there no photo of her from the 2018 Winter Olympics? Sokuya (talk) 18:57, 9 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Sokuya, there is Idan (talk) 09:45, 27 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Good find! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beobaer (talkcontribs) 08:16, 28 April 2020 (UTC) Is it normal to use the same photograph twice in one article? Kdammers (talk) 02:57, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

needs subsections template

edit

I created subsections as requested by the template.Vagabond nanoda (talk) 06:22, 29 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Characters

edit

Nevermind! Misread the sentence! Geographyinitiative (talk) 00:43, 22 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

She is the definition of a monster. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.156.23.132 (talk) 01:39, 26 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:17, 28 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Yeon-mi Park

edit

DPRK if you see this Yeon-mi Park is in Chicago Illinois living downtown. 153.90.17.154 (talk) 20:54, 24 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Kim Yo-jong vs Kim Yo Jong

edit

At the moment, the article's title has her name romanized as "Kim Yo-jong" but the lead sentence has it as "Kim Yo Jong". The article and others related mix both versions. But we should really pick one and be consistent. It's especially jarring to have the lead sentence not match the article title. Google trends seems to give a slight advantage to the non-hyphenated version. I don't have much of an opinion here and a picking a Korean romanization is a rather ill-defined issue by our naming conventions. Any opinions either way? Consistency is the goal, I move that a no-consensus result mean that the article's usage should match the currently existing article title. There's no hurry here and this is a low-traffic article so this discussion may rather extended in time. If no consensus is reached within 6 months, perhaps that should trigger the non-consensus result of matching the current article title. Jason Quinn (talk) 06:42, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 17 September 2024

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Bobby Cohn (talk) 15:34, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply


Kim Yo-jongKim Yo Jong – Appears to be the WP:COMMONNAME, and matches the official spelling preference of North Korea (see Romanization of Korean (North)#Guide). Here's a mediocre Ngram, but anecdotally if you scroll through Google News it seems a large majority of recent articles use the spelling with the space in it.

Side note: for move requests for North Korean people, the official romanization standard of North Korea alone should not be sufficient for approving a move. WP:NCKO recommends McCune–Reischauer, which does not have a space in the personal name. These kinds of moves should be made on a case-by-case basis with WP:COMMONNAME evidence provided first and foremost. seefooddiet (talk) 12:45, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support – Per the proposal. Yue🌙 04:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Support: as the nom rationale is well explained. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 16:18, 21 September 2024 (UTC)Reply