This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello to Purogato and any others interested. Wikipedia requires that articles be written from a neutral point-of-view, and in an encyclopedic tone. Articles should not sound like resumes, or be promotional. This is particularly important when editing an article about a living person, particularly one who is still working in their chosen field. Using terms like "award-winning", "renown", "legendary proportions", etc is certainly discouraged; colorful phrases like "fledgling and flamboyant", "most sophisticated", "bastion of smart and stylish writing" could potentially work, but only if well-backed up by multiple independent, secondary sources; I can't see support for phrases like that in the given source. The article before my and Megb64's edits came across as very flattering of Rachlis. He may or may not deserve flattery, but even if he does, that's not Wikipedia's place. If you have specific concerns, please share them and I'm happy to discuss. —Ganesha811 (talk) 02:03, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
