Talk:Koh-i-Sultan

Koh-i-Sultan has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 22, 2017. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Koh-i-Sultan appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 February 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Koh-i-Sultan volcano in Pakistan last erupted approximately 90,000 years ago and still displays fumarolic activity?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2017/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Koh-i-Sultan.

Wikipedia

Volcanoes Mid‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pakistan Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Miniapolis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 22 August 2016.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Mountains Mid‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

[1]
Google

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Koh-i-Sultan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080622113624/http://www.apnabalochistan.com:80/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=40&Itemid=76 to http://apnabalochistan.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=40&Itemid=76

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:50, 29 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Koh-i-Sultan/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tisquesusa (talk · contribs) 05:23, 21 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Very complete article about a volcano little known, good job

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Well-written, correct grammar, lead is ok, but could be expanded a bit, lay-out good
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
Extensive list of reliable references, wording is not copyvio'd, neat
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Complete overview of the various characteristics of this volcano. Enough detail about the rock types, ages and location
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
No bias in this relatively sensitive region between Iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
No problems
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
More images could be added, but there are none freely available of this mountain at Commons, so ok
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Compliments for creating an extensive well-written article about a relatively unknown and for Pakistan unusual volcano. Great article.

Hum. @Tisquesusa: seems like the passing has not been registered. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:57, 22 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic