Talk:Koh-i-Sultan/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tisquesusa (talk · contribs) 05:23, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

Very complete article about a volcano little known, good job

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Well-written, correct grammar, lead is ok, but could be expanded a bit, lay-out good

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   Extensive list of reliable references, wording is not copyvio'd, neat

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Complete overview of the various characteristics of this volcano. Enough detail about the rock types, ages and location

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   No bias in this relatively sensitive region between Iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   No problems

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   More images could be added, but there are none freely available of this mountain at Commons, so ok

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Compliments for creating an extensive well-written article about a relatively unknown and for Pakistan unusual volcano. Great article.

Hum. @Tisquesusa: seems like the passing has not been registered. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:57, 22 January 2017 (UTC)