VLS cell numbers

edit

Somebody erroneously or intentionally exaggerated the number of VLS cells this class has. All you need to do is google INS Kolkata and you will soon find overhead shots of this ship which clearly show only 4 8-cell VLS modules for air defense missiles for a total of 32 air defense missiles, but the Wiki page claims 2 32 cell VLS modules for a total of 64 air defense missiles. This is either a gross mistake or a plain lie. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.119.64.112 (talk) 17:51, 6 September 2014 (UTC)Reply


Class name

edit

Is this the Bangalore-class or the Kolkata-class? - Aerobird 17:43, 3 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Kolkata-class destroyer/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: QatarStarsLeague (talk · contribs) 00:06, 23 July 2013 (UTC) I have a similar article up for nomination. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 00:06, 23 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Lead & infobox

edit

The lead passes, but within the info box, you must convert all measurements.

  Done Anir1uph | talk | contrib 20:13, 23 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Please convert missile ranges. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 00:18, 24 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Oops! Sorry, my bad. Completely missed those! Done now. :) Anir1uph | talk | contrib 03:31, 24 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Development

edit

Please establish the identity of Project 15A somewhere in the subsection.

  Done Anir1uph | talk | contrib 20:13, 23 July 2013 (UTC)Reply


"...steel for the lead ship was cut in March 2003." You mention this twice. Please remove the second mention for fluidity.

  Done Anir1uph | talk | contrib 20:13, 23 July 2013 (UTC)Reply


"Construction began in September 2003 at Mazagon Docks..." In Mumbai or Nhava?

  Done added Mumbai, as mentioned in the Naval Technology reference. Anir1uph | talk | contrib 20:13, 23 July 2013 (UTC)Reply


"St Petersburg's..." Please refer to the demonym as "Russia's" as opposed to the ambiguous "St. Petersburg's".

  Done Added city's wikilink. Anir1uph | talk | contrib 20:13, 23 July 2013 (UTC)Reply


"...expected to be 30,000 crore (US$5 billion)." What was/is the cost of Project 15A? Can this data be procured?

  Done That data is already mentioned in the section "Ships of the class". I have expanded on that. Anir1uph | talk | contrib 20:13, 23 July 2013 (UTC)Reply


"...US Dollar 1 billion in costs." Please abbreviate using the following symbol: $.

  Done Anir1uph | talk | contrib 20:13, 23 July 2013 (UTC)Reply


"After finalisation of design..." If you are using British English, please ensure that this is uniform throughout the entire article, and then specify it on the talk page.

Added Indian English template. Anir1uph | talk | contrib 20:16, 23 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
It isn't visible on the talk page. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 00:24, 24 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Aah, i didnt add it to the talk page. I have done that now. Anir1uph | talk | contrib 03:31, 24 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Design and description

edit

Again, conversion is necessary.

  Done Anir1uph | talk | contrib 20:13, 23 July 2013 (UTC)Reply


"...they are the largest destroyer..." Plural form, please.

  Done Anir1uph | talk | contrib 20:13, 23 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ships of the class

edit

"...including the cost of spares..." Spare equipment and armaments?

The cited reference says, "The three Project 15-A Kolkata-class destroyers, bigger and more heavily armed warships, will each cost the navy Rs 3,800 crore (US $950 million), including the cost of long-term spare parts." I have corrected the language to be more accurate. Anir1uph | talk | contrib 20:16, 23 July 2013 (UTC)Reply


Are you unable to complete the table?

The table can be completed only when the ships are commissioned, which has been regularly delayed due to over-runs. Better to leave it empty than guess (No reliable sources exist for the same). For Home port,The navy usually gives out that info during the commissioning ceremony. No reliable reports are available for those either. Both will be filled as and when the ships are inducted. Anir1uph | talk | contrib 20:16, 23 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Yes, the homeport matter was the underlying intent of the inquiry. This is fine. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 00:21, 24 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Conclusion

edit

I salute your endearing effort on this article. Once everything has been fixed, I will pass this wonderful article! Congratulations! QatarStarsLeague (talk) 17:28, 23 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

One more conversion to be made! QatarStarsLeague (talk) 00:22, 24 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/Kolkata-class-guided-missile-destroyers/
    Triggered by \bnaval-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
  • http://www.naval-technology.com/news/news100652.html
    Triggered by \bnaval-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
  • http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/kolkata-class-guided-missile-destroyers/
    '

  Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 20:09, 9 April 2014 (UTC)'Triggered by \bnaval-technology\.com\b on the local blacklistReply

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 13:04, 3 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Barak 8

edit

IHS Janes reports that Barak 8 will start being fitted to the INS Kolkata by the end of 2015.Antiochus the Great (talk) 15:25, 10 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kolkata-class destroyer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:56, 12 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:46, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply