Talk:Korowai gecko
Latest comment: 9 months ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic Did you know nomination
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from Korowai gecko appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 March 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| .jpg) |
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 17:50, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
( )
A korowai gecko found on the west coast of the Auckland Region, New Zealand
- ... that off-roading at Muriwai Beach in New Zealand may be damaging the habitat of the newly described korowai gecko? Source: https://www.rnz.co.nz/national/programmes/checkpoint/audio/2018924043/new-species-of-gecko-on-auckland-s-west-coast-named
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/The Korea Daily News
- Comment: The iNaturalist image is technically not research-grade, but is definitely correct, as the photo was taken by the herpetologist who described the species (i.e. iNaturalist hasn't put the species in their database yet).
Created by Prosperosity (talk). Self-nominated at 21:12, 31 January 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Korowai gecko; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- starting review--Kevmin § 18:07, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Article new enough and long enough. Article is fully cited, sources are neutral, and information is presented neutrally. The hook is cited and verified. No policy issues are seen in the hook or the article, no close paraphrasing or copyvios identified. Image is appropriately licensed for main page and thumbnail is identifiable. Looks good to go.--Kevmin § 18:39, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Kevmin: Great to hear, thanks! Would you be able to add a DYK approval tick {{subst:DYKtick}} to your comment? --Prosperosity (talk) 03:07, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
