 | The contents of the Krishnath College page were merged into Murshidabad University#History on 12 September 2022. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Krishnath College redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Krishnath College was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (June 30, 2017). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Krishnath College. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Krishnath College/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Tushar Singha (talk · contribs) 03:51, 5 June 2017 (UTC)--Peapod21 (talk) 23:29, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Review comment
editThe article contain language, grammer are correct. There is no template like unreference, citation needed, notability etc. . The article refer from 9 reliable sources.
Review comment
editDisagreed. The article's grammar needs a lot of copy-editing. Lines like these: "Since 1853 this college fit to be declared a heritage institution has been unswervingly engaged in promoting and fostering education among the people of four districts such as Murshidabad, " make me doubt the neutrality of the article. It was written like an advertisement. It only has 9 sources, most of them from the school itself, and has no illustrations other than its emblem. It therefore fails points 1, 2, 4, and 6. Jesus, the person who wrote the comment above didn't even write it in correct grammar. You cannot judge an article's prose by its lack of templates. It is, frankly, badly written, and has 7/9 of the sources come from the institution itself or an affiliated institution. It is a far way from reaching any of the four points I stated it failed, and should instantly fail this nomination. I will be adding templates for all the problems. ALSO, the reviewer above attends the college. It says so in his userboxes! This is a clear conflict of interest. Peapod21 (talk) 22:42 June 30, 2017