Talk:Kulen

Durable

You don't usually hear of foods as "durable," so I changed it to "edible," only to realize that now "edible" is in the sentence twice, which seems a bit wrong. Maybe someone else can make it better?

In order to resove dilema, I replaced first "edible" with "shelf-stable". I agree that "durable" is not suitable word refering to food, "shelf-stable" or "stable" would be more appropriate. Suggestion:"Kulen matures during following winter, when can be eaten (although not fully dried and cured yet with very hot taste)but full taste characteristics reaches in the following summer. Kulen is a shelf-stable meat product, sustaining shelf life up to two years when kept at refrigeration (or even room) temperatures." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.80.150.77 (talk) 23:56, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 20:53, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Sources and informality and OR

This is a very interesting subject. But it reads like one person's thoughts. How do we know, for example that the large intestine is selected for Kulen because it is bigger? Yes, obviously a sausage made from large intestine will be of greater girth than one made from the small intestine, but is that why it is used? And the article says: it has not yet become a major product due to the lengthy and somewhat complicated production process. Without a source, that looks like OR to me. 98.82.22.154 (talk) 16:14, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Just thrown out that last bit and rewrote the paragraph using sources. GregorB (talk) 13:15, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Most likely that is common knowledge among those who makes it and thus wasn't regarded as in need of sources. 78.70.77.75 (talk) 15:07, 10 May 2014 (UTC)