Talk:Kuleshov effect
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editThis isn't a stub at all. This was the experiment. What more do you want?
(10 December 2006 5:19 PM) Removed a link to a poorly-written, uninsightful article concerning the Kuleshov effect.
Bordwell and Thompson's Film History book says Kuleshov got to the Academy in 1920 and made the experiment in 1921 so I corrected it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Neonknights (talk • contribs) 15:49, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Looking at the video on youtube, it's a little girl in the coffin- will edit to reflect that. L.Crono —Preceding undated comment added 21:31, 18 October 2009 (UTC).
Misleading illustration: Should be deleted
editThis illustration, from Wikimedia Commons, is probably an inaccurate representation of the Kuleshov experiment and only lists its source as blogs.suntimes.com, which is not verifiable (I searched that site for "Kuleshov" and found nothing). It appears to have been scanned from a book and thus there may be copyright issues, too.
Since no copies of the original experiment exist, we can be pretty sure that these images are not from the film. The question then becomes, who created this simulation of the experiment?
With all these issues, it seems to me that the image should be deleted from Wikimedia Commons and not included in this article. Or, at the very least, the image should have a disclaimer explaining that it is not from the original experiment.
--Jeremy Butler 13:28, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
...I'm pretty sure the caption on the example is wrong?
editI'm no film buff, but shouldn't it say that the INTERMEDIARY shot was changed, not the LAST shot?
24.154.230.116 (talk) 19:46, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
The last shot changed because originally it should have been a woman resting, and the audience interpreted it as desire, with this new clip instead showing a little girl playing. I figure the last shot was changed as a form of sexual censoring. There are actually more changes, in the original the man makes less facial gestures as seen in [1]
Coz7 (talk) 15:05, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
References