Talk:Kum Kapu demonstration
Latest comment: 17 years ago by OttomanReference in topic rewrote
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kum Kapu demonstration article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. | |||||||
rewrote
editbasically moved out "lies" as Hnchaks tried to assasinate, and actually cited sources. Cheers. Hetoum 09:17, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- Where is your citations. Where did you get that information that claims "Hnchaks tried to assasinate" is wrong. Thanks. --OttomanReference 13:17, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Hello,
I am reverting back to last version by me, from your vandalism. This was a demonstration, and does not need a military conflict box. I cited sources and used proper grammar. (Hetoum 19:01, 22 April 2007 (UTC))
- There are two different events are going on at the same time. Second event is following "demonstrations" arise by the first event. First one is the initiation of demonstrations, which the perpetrator made his move with his followers (at the church) and two soldiers whom were assigned to protect the peace were killed. This is an armed conflict that involved two and more soldiers. Opposing side is Hunchaks. If you are claiming that Armenian militia is a gang of terrorist who threaten a religious person and at the end killed two soldiers which is clearly a an activity of terror, Himmmmm, even this does not disqualify the event as NOT being an armed conflict. I think it is normal to accept the armed conflict as the beginning of the events. What do you think??? Also The correct name is Kum Kapu Affrey. Demonstrations is your interpretation. If you search the document its conman name if Affray. Please revert the name to original. Thanks. --OttomanReference 19:15, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
I don't think much of your hostile commentary. You contradict yourself, use poor grammar, and do not cite sources. No conflict box is not needed, see Kent State shooting or something for comparison. Cheers Hetoum 22:26, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- So this is a terrorism, as you put it, performed by a gang. That is fine. This terrorist version gives less credibility. Why should I care... --OttomanReference 02:10, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- By the way attacking my grammar is a "personal attack". Please keep this in the lines of professionalism. --OttomanReference 02:13, 23 April 2007 (UTC)