Talk:Kumar Swami

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Princehr999 in topic Contested deletion

Contested deletion

edit

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because there is nothing which has been written to promote the subject. All things have been presented after thoroughly researching the subject. The subject has indeed recorded those achievements and all data into the article has been substantiated with proper, reliable, independent references. The subject is an Ayurvedic physician who has spiritual interests. If there is anything which seems promotional, then please report here. Presenting facts with proper references is what Wikipedia is made for. --Princehr999 (talk) 13:57, 1 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

What about that false claim of Kumar Swami day celebration in New York?-- Harshil want to talk? 14:56, 1 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Where have I written the word 'celebration' in relation to New York ? Please read the article carefully before pointing out non-existent flaws. Have you gone through the references first ? The reference clearly shows the legislative resolution passed by New York State Senate which proclaimed April 29,2011 as 'Brahmrishi Shree Kumar Swami Day'. You can read the resolution by following the source link. Please go through the references. I never used the word 'celebration' in context of New York Senate legislation. I would also like to inform you that this article has been reviewed by ::@CaptainEek:, and he himself made sure that the article is neutral and non-promotional. He removed all the peacocking terms and irrelevant stuff. What's there in the article is after thorough analysis by Wikipedia experts.Princehr999 (talk) 17:44, 1 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Also, the way you used the term 'false claim' itself shows a glimpse of some personal issue you have towards this person. Any neutral person would have first gone through the reference.Princehr999 (talk) 17:48, 1 November 2019 (UTC)Reply