 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
I'm adding reference material from an archaeological survey performed in 1989. The information is both accurate and true. Can you please be more specific as to why you are arbitrarily removing my additions without writing anything on the discussion page? Thank you! Josef.salyer (talk) 07:04, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
- According to the edit summary, the editor did not feel the content was appropriate in style or tone. Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia content policies, especially Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Wikipedia is not a guidebook. Also see the Wikipedia:Manual of Style, especially the usage section. • Gene93k (talk) 17:31, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- Can you give a pointer to where a reader can find The Quig Dig for verification, such as a website or author, publisher and book number (ISBN/OCLC...)? • Gene93k (talk) 17:31, 16 April 2008 (UTC)