This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles
Find correct name
The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere.
The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Eurovision, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Eurovision-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EurovisionWikipedia:WikiProject EurovisionTemplate:WikiProject EurovisionEurovision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot23:15, 27 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago7 comments2 people in discussion
Hi @Edwin of Northumbria, thank you for improving the article, it seems you've put a significant amount of effort into it in the past few days. You and I have been going back and forth and changing the way numbers are written, however, and I figured it might be time to have a conversation about it. To my knowledge, most style guides (American ones, at least) recommend spelling out numbers up to twenty, and using digits for higher numbers. Could we just leave it at that? Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 14:08, 27 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi Revirvlkodlaku. In a word, no. (subtle joke) If one follows New Hart's Rules (as directed by Fowler's Dictionary of Modern English Usage[1]), then the advice is to "[u]se figures for ages expressed in ordinal numbers"[2] Also, APA Style (note country of origin) is to use numerals for "numbers 10 and above" and "numbers that represent time, date, ages, [...]" (my emphases).[3]
MOS:NUMERAL states that "[i]ntegers from zero to nine are spelled out in words", and that "[c]omparable values nearby one another should be all spelled out or all in figures, even if one of the numbers would normally be written differently" (my emphases).
I see no reason to depart from this here under WP:UCS. Indeed, since Moniz has acted in Portuguese and British (not American) English language productions, and the US is not (unlike the UK) a participant in the Eurovision Song Contest, there is an argument that British practice (i.e. Hart) should be followed.
Personally, I find numbers in text much easier to digest (and particularly to memorize) if they are expressed using numerals. I can see a certain logic, and perhaps an aesthetic reason for spelling out numbers less than ten, but not for numbers of two or more digits.
I am amending the article text in line with the above points, and hope you will respect this decision. I express gratitude for your thanks regarding my contribution to the article.
P.S. This is not just a matter of style. Experimental evidence suggests when reading, people process numbers represented using digits rather than words faster and more accurately.
Yes, they absolutely were, and logical, as well. Sometimes I get stuck in a box and have trouble getting out of it, so it helps to get a little friendly nudge once in a while. Happy new year to you as well, and yes, I am in Alberta, so warm weather is certainly one thing I can wish for, though probably to no avail 😩🥶 Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 02:50, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
