Talk:LGBTQ rights in Qatar

Latest comment: 11 months ago by GogoLion in topic Enforcement?

Notable

edit

this article doesnt meet notability just because it is a country. You dont need to have articles on rights in every article if there is nothing to discuss. the first section specifically says nothing to do LGBT issues as arisen in the country (also unsourced), with the previous sentence mentioning constitutional law (more suited to Law in Qatar). The next section are vague to the title as is mentiosn nothing to do with privacy rights/laws. Wikipedia is not a weblog to list anything and everything that happens in timeline format.

Let me rephrase that: only 1 sentence in the whole page is relevant to the law, but it is also cited to a page that has an obvious conflict of interest.Lihaas (talk) 19:00, 2 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
You can't be serious. Which agenda are you trying to serve here ? Hektor (talk) 18:25, 6 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
This is easily the most WTF page title i've run across in quite some time. 108.250.205.112 (talk) 21:27, 10 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

"In 2002, protests arose concerning the new Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar. Human rights critics expressed concern that LGBT medical students might face trouble with the law for their sexual orientation.[5]"

This is false, there were no protests. The article linked cites one (fairly random) person's opinion on the issue. That does not constitute as a protest, let alone 'protests arising'. Can anyone fix this?

89.211.165.221 (talk) 16:56, 7 October 2011 (UTC)NadiaReply

Where's the T?

edit

As it stands, this article is just LGB rights in Qatar. There's no information whatsoever on the rights or public acceptance (or lack of either) of trans people in Qatar. Can anyone fix this? Xmoogle (talk) 15:19, 24 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on LGBT rights in Qatar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:52, 21 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Uncertainty about whether Qatar is a member of the GCC

edit

The Wikipedia article on the GCC provides conflicting information about whether Qatar is in fact a member (I have pointed this out on the talk page for that article, with a cross-reference to this one). If Qatar is not in fact a member, the reference here to the GCC is not of relevance to LGBT rights in Qatar.188.230.240.75 (talk) 11:56, 6 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Note 5 is a dead link ("no contact with server"). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.230.240.75 (talk) 12:05, 6 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on LGBT rights in Qatar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:24, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Homosexuality ≠ Homosexual intercourse

edit

Homosexuality is a sexual orientation and attraction. Homosexual intercourse is an action. They are 2 different (but related things). Thecorrector776 (talk) 21:47, 10 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA22 - Sect 200 - Thu

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 September 2022 and 8 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kaisery (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Luciuszlt (talk) 23:30, 27 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Enforcement?

edit

According to Human Dignity Trust, the enforcement is rare. They say "There is some limited evidence of the law being enforced in recent years, however reports are rare". -GogoLion (talk) 22:48, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply