Talk:LW6/8/GA1

Latest comment: 11 years ago by North8000 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: North8000 (talk · contribs) 18:29, 13 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

I am starting a review on this article. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 18:29, 13 March 2013 (UTC)Reply


Review comments

edit

This is one of several "LW" articles which I'm reviewing at once, including recently adding 2 in response to editor request. One concern (clarification of defining body vs. classification bodies, and related terminology) runs across all of them, and we discussed at the LW3 review. IMO tweaks that I made here resolved this. North8000 (talk) 12:32, 17 March 2013 (UTC)Reply


A few times later in the article the bi-athlon / rifle shooting aspect is mentioned making me realize / think that such is a part of this, but it doesn't seem to be covered in the article. Should it be? North8000 (talk) 12:40, 17 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

I don't understand. North8000 (talk) 13:26, 22 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
In para-Nordic skiing, which includes the cross-country and biathlon events, this classification is grouped with other standing classes. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:00, 22 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Here's what I was trying to ask about. Items later in the article indicate that this includes bi-athlons which are events what include skiing and shooting. There is good coverage of the skiing portion (equipment used, how they go about doing it etc.) but there seems to be no coverage of the shooting portion except a quick mention of rules. So on the face of it one might say that that part is missing from the article. And so I was trying to start a discussion (and get your thoughts) on whether or not that is the case; i.e. whether or not the article needs more coverage of that aspect in order to meet the criteria for full coverage of the topic. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 21:11, 22 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Added a bit about Biathlon shooting technique and equipment. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:06, 26 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Cool. Resolved North8000 (talk) 00:09, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

You may want to consider expansion of the title at a later date. North8000 (talk) 13:06, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

GA criteria final checklist

edit

Well-written

Factually accurate and verifiable

Broad in its coverage

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute

Illustrated, if possible, by images

This has passed as a Wikipedia Good Article

edit

Congratulations. This has passed as a Wikipedia Good Article. Nice work! Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 13:12, 27 March 2013 (UTC) ReviewerReply