Talk:Lady Dimitrescu

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lady Dimitrescu/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Etriusus (talk · contribs) 05:23, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

My lil' gay heart fawns over this woman. I'll take this one. I see you're a brand new editor, just fair warning that these thing can get intense and even experienced editors can fail these. Do you have any prior wiki experience? Also, Please please please used edit summaries; makes everyone's life 10x easier, and avoids an annoyed talk page warning. When you've fixed something, please used a  Done, strikethrough, or some other means of indicating an issue has been resolved Etrius ( Us) 05:23, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Copy-vios

• Earwig only flags the same sentence over and over. Each example appears to be a verse copying and not a copy-vio. Also, there is a concerning amount of porn in there.
• I'll tag any examples if I catch them on spot checks.

Sources

• "Maggie Robertson on Twitter". Twitter. May 6, 2021. Archived from the original on May 29, 2021. Retrieved May 24, 2021. "…THRILLED to finally announce I was the voiceover and performance capture artist behind our beloved Lady Dimitrescu in Resident Evil Village…" No, just no. This is completely redundant anyway. WP:TWITTER
• FN 6 checks out under WP:BLOG
• Yaya Han (April 17, 2021). "Cosplaying Lady Dimitrescu from Resident Evil Village... for Capcom!". YouTube. Archived from the original on May 6, 2021. Retrieved May 6, 2021. Cut, WP:YOUTUBE
• Nightingale, Ed (April 26, 2021). "Dominatrix explains what would happen if Resident Evil's 9'6" Lady Dimitrescu actually trampled you". PinkNews. Archived from the original on May 7, 2021. Retrieved May 6, 2021. The first instance of this source is citing a Twitter post, cut.
• Plunkett, Luke (February 1, 2021). "Capcom Says Resident Evil Village's Very Tall Vampire Lady Is Nearly Ten Feet Tall". Kotaku. Archived from the original on May 7, 2021. Retrieved February 2, 2021. duplicate source, just add the whole ref and removed the bullet.
• [1] I have no words for what I just read, this isn't an edit, just an observation
• All sources have been manually confirmed to be live. All, save for the above, are reasonably reliable.

Me after reading all these sources. I may be a simp, but oh lord these people are down bad.

Images

• One image, fair use rational given, check out

Prose

• 'Village' say the whole title
• ' portrayed ' voiced and motion captured by, specify

Will finish probably tomorrow. Etrius ( Us) 05:23, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

• I'm sorry for butting in and being a jerk/spoilsport, but I object to this GAN. Specifically, I object to the drive-by GAN by an editor who has registered literally two days before, and who then created this GAN after making less then 15 edits on the entirety of English Wikipedia using this handle. Even assuming that the small amount of edits made by an anonymous IP on the article could be credited solely to GlatorNator, this person is certainly not anywhere close to being the primary contributor to this article, when much of the prose and sourcing was actually contributed by me, Masem and a few other regular editors. I'd like to point out that this practice is frowned on by the established editing community: see the page history of this article's talk page and specifically the guidelines under Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Instructions about editors who are not significant contributors as an example. I also disagree with the reviewer's rationale on their opinion as to the suitability of some of the sources used in the article, nevermind the fact that the good article assessment criteria does not appear to be quoted or followed by the reviewer as the basis for their GAN. Their comments seem to indicate a lack of understanding of the contents contained within the guideline that defines what a reliable secondary source is. For one, just because a reliable and independent secondary source (news media or self-publishing subject-matter expert) decides to comment on, or react to a self-published source as the basis of their reporting or analysis, does not in any way invalidate their reliability by default. It is not original research. Haleth (talk) 10:15, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

I would like to withdraw User:Etriusus. Apologize. GlatorNator (talk) 10:43, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 4 June 2021

Arkley07 (talk) 07:58, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

i want to be able to edit this page because i have more information

 Not done While you are waiting for the permission to do so, you will have to make proper edit requests and be more specific about what changes you want to make. Shellwood (talk) 10:06, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Romanian?

Is she Romanian? Dimitrescu sounds very Romanian. All cats are british (talk) 20:57, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Eastern european village/romanian village

The language they use is romanian, the names are romanian, so I suppose instead of using "eastern european village" we could use "romanian village". 46.97.168.102 (talk) 15:50, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lady Dimitrescu/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Etriusus (talk · contribs) 05:23, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

My lil' gay heart fawns over this woman. I'll take this one. I see you're a brand new editor, just fair warning that these thing can get intense and even experienced editors can fail these. Do you have any prior wiki experience? Also, Please please please used edit summaries; makes everyone's life 10x easier, and avoids an annoyed talk page warning. When you've fixed something, please used a  Done, strikethrough, or some other means of indicating an issue has been resolved Etrius ( Us) 05:23, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Copy-vios

• Earwig only flags the same sentence over and over. Each example appears to be a verse copying and not a copy-vio. Also, there is a concerning amount of porn in there.
• I'll tag any examples if I catch them on spot checks.

Sources

• "Maggie Robertson on Twitter". Twitter. May 6, 2021. Archived from the original on May 29, 2021. Retrieved May 24, 2021. "…THRILLED to finally announce I was the voiceover and performance capture artist behind our beloved Lady Dimitrescu in Resident Evil Village…" No, just no. This is completely redundant anyway. WP:TWITTER
• FN 6 checks out under WP:BLOG
• Yaya Han (April 17, 2021). "Cosplaying Lady Dimitrescu from Resident Evil Village... for Capcom!". YouTube. Archived from the original on May 6, 2021. Retrieved May 6, 2021. Cut, WP:YOUTUBE
• Nightingale, Ed (April 26, 2021). "Dominatrix explains what would happen if Resident Evil's 9'6" Lady Dimitrescu actually trampled you". PinkNews. Archived from the original on May 7, 2021. Retrieved May 6, 2021. The first instance of this source is citing a Twitter post, cut.
• Plunkett, Luke (February 1, 2021). "Capcom Says Resident Evil Village's Very Tall Vampire Lady Is Nearly Ten Feet Tall". Kotaku. Archived from the original on May 7, 2021. Retrieved February 2, 2021. duplicate source, just add the whole ref and removed the bullet.
• [2] I have no words for what I just read, this isn't an edit, just an observation
• All sources have been manually confirmed to be live. All, save for the above, are reasonably reliable.

Me after reading all these sources. I may be a simp, but oh lord these people are down bad.

Images

• One image, fair use rational given, check out

Prose

• 'Village' say the whole title
• ' portrayed ' voiced and motion captured by, specify

Will finish probably tomorrow. Etrius ( Us) 05:23, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

• I'm sorry for butting in and being a jerk/spoilsport, but I object to this GAN. Specifically, I object to the drive-by GAN by an editor who has registered literally two days before, and who then created this GAN after making less then 15 edits on the entirety of English Wikipedia using this handle. Even assuming that the small amount of edits made by an anonymous IP on the article could be credited solely to GlatorNator, this person is certainly not anywhere close to being the primary contributor to this article, when much of the prose and sourcing was actually contributed by me, Masem and a few other regular editors. I'd like to point out that this practice is frowned on by the established editing community: see the page history of this article's talk page and specifically the guidelines under Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Instructions about editors who are not significant contributors as an example. I also disagree with the reviewer's rationale on their opinion as to the suitability of some of the sources used in the article, nevermind the fact that the good article assessment criteria does not appear to be quoted or followed by the reviewer as the basis for their GAN. Their comments seem to indicate a lack of understanding of the contents contained within the guideline that defines what a reliable secondary source is. For one, just because a reliable and independent secondary source (news media or self-publishing subject-matter expert) decides to comment on, or react to a self-published source as the basis of their reporting or analysis, does not in any way invalidate their reliability by default. It is not original research. Haleth (talk) 10:15, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

I would like to withdraw User:Etriusus. Apologize. GlatorNator (talk) 10:43, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Permission

Hey User:Haleth and User:MatthewHoobin. As you guys were the top contributors, I want to have your permission that I would attempt to send this article out for GAN since I think most of the relevant sources were already implemented since there are no more new sources were popping out. GlatorNator (ᴛ) 05:01, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lady Dimitrescu/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kung Fu Man (talk · contribs) 23:55, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

   b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. (reference section):

   The article has a proper References section. --Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

   b. (citations to reliable sources):

   All sources cited are recognized as either reliable sources or situational sources cited in the appropriate manner.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

   c. (OR):

   Spotcheck was performed, no original research was done or statements not supported by the checked sources. Specific sources include [13] and [14], which draw comparison between the character and previous series antagonists Mr. X and the Baker family in terms of approach, source [6] does discuss her design history in the details cited, and sources [55], [56] and [57] do discuss her reception in the matter cited with no OR performed based off their statements.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

   d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

   No copyright violations done. The majority of the article is original writing and quotes applied as needed.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. (major aspects):

   b. (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

All issues addressed on User:GlatorNator's talk page, really only minor ones at all to bring up. Overall a very entertaining and thorough read!--Kung Fu Man (talk) 23:55, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Arigato gozaimasu for the review :). GlatorNator (ᴛ) 23:57, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

"Helena Mankowska" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Helena Mankowska has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 15 § Helena Mankowska until a consensus is reached. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 20:27, 15 September 2023 (UTC)