Talk:Lawman (film)
A fact from Lawman (film) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 December 2007, and was viewed approximately 442 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fair use rationale for Image:Lawman.jpg
editImage:Lawman.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Crediting
editI removed some ill-sourced speculative material that is directly contradicted by other sources and by at least one of the individuals concerned: [1]. This must not be reinstated without multiple reliable independent sources, per WP:BLP. Guy (Help!) 14:24, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lawman (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040109193215/http://www.apolloguide.com/mov_fullrev.asp?CID=3498 to http://www.apolloguide.com/mov_fullrev.asp?CID=3498
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:41, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Weak Synopsis
editThe last two sentences of the plot synopsis seem rather strange and un-Wikipedia-like to me.
First, "The action in this film is dry and tersely authentic." I don't understand what the "dry" is trying to convey. According to my dictionary, "dry" means "dull and uninteresting". Did the author perhaps intend something more like, "The action in this film is matter-of-fact and tersely authentic."
Second, "There are no pretty cowboys or pretences of morality and the ending has the resolution of a rattle snake bite." What is a "pretty cowboy"? The word “pretences” is misspelled (assuming American English is used for an American western movie). And what on earth is "the resolution of a rattle snake bite" supposed to mean? (Not to mention that "rattlesnake" is one word, not two.)
I don't know the rules for editing Wikipedia articles, but maybe someone could rewrite the last two sentences of the synopsis along the lines of:
"The action in this film is straightforward and tersely authentic. The ending is abrupt and unemotional." 2601:600:A27F:E1D0:B03F:B818:10C8:DBFF (talk) 07:13, 1 April 2023 (UTC)