Accepting this article

edit

This article isn't perfect, and there's probably some more work to be done, but I think that with the majority of the promotional language removed it at least passes GNG as a stub. The majority of the sources aren't spectacular, but as a sum total I think it's enough to scrape by. Happy to discuss it further if necessary. Primefac (talk) 04:27, 26 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

edit

This page should not be speedily deleted because poor sources for the article and it is not as per the standards of wikipedia. It seems it is written by someone close to the person therefore it is biased. In fact in one of the links she has an article which talks about her wikipedia page and as per the wikipedia policy a page cannot be used for the publicity. She does not meet our notability guidelines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sabishaikhauthor (talkcontribs) 10:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:37, 16 September 2020 (UTC)Reply