Talk:Legendary Weapons of China

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Chinese cinema task force.

Hong Kong: Cinema Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by Hong Kong Cinema (assessed as Low-importance).

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (21)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (291)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,052)

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,473) • Stub-Class articles (6,695)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (388) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,340)

Plot?

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

It is annoying that someone has written the plot based on the English dub of the film, rather than a subtitled copy. Many of the subtle plot points are missed, and the use of the word 'pugilism', whilst amusing in a 'typical of the time' dubbing way just gets annoying after a while. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.151.104.138 (talk) 17:00, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Looks like this is another 'dead' page....

Oh well, better than no page at all i suppose. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.122.93.223 (talk) 02:20, 12 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic