Talk:Lehmber Hussainpuri

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified


Untitled

edit

Great - Yes Unique - Yes "one of the greatest Punjabi singers of all time" - No. He's not in the same league as Gurdas Mann or some of the older singers like Kuldip Manak.

This article has POV problems. For example:

  • His style, his voice, and his demeanor capture and engross all who experience him.
  • This album was a massive success...
  • Nevertheless, everyone still awaited an official solo release from this newly crowned king of Bhangra.
  • His greatly anticipated debut album...
  • Lehmber has also been acclaimed one of the best live performers in Bhangra today, and is one of the most demanded bhangra singers of the time.

It reads like hype generated by a publicist. It's not encyclopedic. It's also completely unsourced. UncleFester 20:38, 27 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

References

edit

All appropriate references/sources have been added. Kindly review them and, if appropriate, remove the "Articles Lacking Sources" tag. Thank You.


Image of Lehmber Hussainpuri

edit

Can someone please follow the proper steps in uploading this image of Lehmber: http://www.punjabiamericanheritagesociety.com/images/blueturban2.jpg

I am fairly new at this and do not want to infringe on any copyrights.

- I wasnt sure bout the copyright on the one that you provided, so i just used an album cover, newayz, its my first pic upload so if i did anything wrong plz correct thnx --J.a.f.a.c. 17:44, 25 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Incorrect Spelling of his Name

edit

The correct way to spell his name is as follows, Lembher Hussainpuri. Not Lehmber. For proof of this, please see his offical website www.lembher.com. There you will see it spelled as Lembher Hussainpuri. Also on Google you do a search, you get much more results for that spelling rather than the other one.

So could some please change the spelling of the article and re-direct it to the new artical. Thank you. Sonu27 19:24, 15 September 2006 (UTC)Reply


Confusion about spelling of name

edit

Actually, since his name, like all other traditional Punjabi names, was translated from Gurmukhi, there is a bit of ambiguity as to how it is properly transliterated. However, the above claim that Lehmber's "official" website spells it "Lembher" is invalid. This website claims to be official, yet it is anything but. The "biography" section was clearly lifted straight off the wikipedia article on Lehmber. In essence, Lehmber's "official" website plagiarized this wikipedia article. How do I know it wasn't the other way around? Because I personally wrote most of the wikipedia article, and can tell you firsthand that the wikipedia article is completely original. www.Lembher.com has no credibility, and cannot be accepted as the "official" website. Thus, this article will continue to be titled "Lehmber Hussainpuri".

i completely agree with the person who wrote article about LEHMBER HUSSAINPURI - that LEHMBER HUSSAINPURI is the correct spelling of his name not Lembher. besides lembher doesnt look right- it doesnt go along how it is pronnunced. so "Lehmber" is the correct name,

Merge proposal

edit

The article Lehmber_Hussainpuri_discography should be integrated into this one. Sfacets 04:24, 29 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

VALMIKI

edit

hey people u you need to get your facts right!!! lembher is not a chamar, he is a Valmiki 100%!!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.8.139.100 (talk) 00:55, 23 December 2006 (UTC).Reply

does it really matter wat he is? no i dont think so. he is human so it shouldnt matter what cast he is. But he is a sikh right? well i think so he is. So if he is a chamar or a valmiki--who cares--it doesnt matter--yes it matters--to him--but who are we to jugde him. WHO CARES

LEMBHER HUSSAINPURI

edit

If that's the case then why have you put Lembher down as Chamar on your website?????!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.8.141.129 (talk) 10:56, 3 March 2007 (UTC).Reply

File:Lehmber.jpg Deleted

edit
 

An image used in this article, File:Lehmber.jpg, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons by Martin H. for the following reason: Copyright violation: non-free screenshot of television

What should I do?

You can remove the code for this image from the article text (which can look messy), however a different bot may already have done so. You could also try to search for new images to replace the one deleted. If you think the deletion was in error please raise the issue at Commons.

This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotification (talk) 21:22, 5 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

edit

This page should not be speedily deleted because the article is accurate and not many sources can be found online because this artist is not a mainstream singer — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.122.4.8 (talk) 19:42, 20 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lehmber Hussainpuri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:20, 17 September 2017 (UTC)Reply