| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Flibirigit (talk) 03:06, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
( )
- ... that in 2019, Leonie Schroder was the UK's third-highest taxpayer? Source: "Peter Hargreaves and Leonie Schroder have featured on a new list of the top 50 taxpayers in the UK. Schroder and her family come third on the list compiled by the Sunday Times, paying £116.8m in all tax on their £4bn wealth." ([1])
- ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
- Reviewed: not yet done
Created by Edwardx (talk). Self-nominated at 22:53, 26 June 2020 (UTC).
Is there a QPQ credit yet? It should not take the nominator three weeks to do a QPQ. Flibirigit (talk) 00:34, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- I'm also not sure if the hook can be counted as interesting. To me, third-highest doesn't scream interesting. SL93 (talk) 00:52, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Does anyone have any other potential ideas for a hook? I took a glance at the article but none seemed to come to mind. If nothing else an be proposed and the nominator doesn't return, this may need to be closed as unsuccessful. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 07:06, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
I'm afraid Edwardx has used up their second chances in terms of excessively late QPQs, which I seem to write them about every couple of months. If they submit one before this nomination is closed, then it may continue, but they've been quite active in the days since Narutolovehinata5 pinged their talk page about this nomination. It is way past time that their QPQs be submitted promptly, and that will be the expectation going forward. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:18, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- Does anyone have any other potential ideas for a hook? I took a glance at the article but none seemed to come to mind. If nothing else an be proposed and the nominator doesn't return, this may need to be closed as unsuccessful. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 07:06, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
