Talk:Liberal Party (Norway)

Name of article

There is a discussion on Talk:Liberal Party (Denmark) on moving that page to Venstre (Denmark). I suggest we follow that discussion and act for the Norwegian Venstre in the same way, so when the Danish party is moved, the Norwegian party should be moved to Venstre (Norway) Electionworld 07:03, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Actually it even more important to move the material of this article, since there was another party (not Venstre) working with the name of Liberal Party in Norway and to aviod confusion with Liberal People's Party (Norway). --Soman 07:52, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This article has been renamed as the result of a move request. violet/riga (t) 18:12, 9 May 2005 (UTC)

So why did User:Ssolbergj move this back to "Liberal Party of Norway" in 2007? There are zero references which support the claim that it is commonly called by that name in English. jnestorius^(talk) 00:58, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Venstre - The Liberal Party of Norway - SSJ ☎ 01:43, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

"The Liberal Party of Norway" would appear to be a description rather than a name, since the rest of the article refers to the party as "Venstre" rather than "The Liberal Party". OTOH, This list translates all parties and says "Edited from Aschehoug and Gyldendal's Norwegian Encyclopedia". I don't know whether the translation from Norwegian to English is done by Aschehoug and Gyldendal or the Norwegian Foreign ministry; nor whether the English names are decided by the relevant parties or the translators. This kind of thing needs to be properly sourced. jnestorius^(talk) 18:07, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

1972 split

What happened to the people who split in 1972? Did they form any party? --Soman 08:02, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

They formed the Liberal People's Party (Norway, Old). --Wernher 16:50, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Venstre logo.svg

Image:Venstre logo.svg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:55, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

What is the name of the Party?

The name of the party is not Liberal Party (Norway). What is the name of it, and how do Norwegians commonly refer to it (names, abbreviations, and nicknames)? Astounding that the article doesn't contain that absolutely basic information.CountMacula (talk) 21:29, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Liberal Party (Norway). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110924171401/http://www.regjeringen.no:80/krd/html/valg2011/bf5.html to http://www.regjeringen.no/krd/html/valg2011/bf5.html
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080106130300/http://www.nrk.no:80/nyheter/innenriks/valg/val_2007/resultat/?type=parti&id=v to http://www.nrk.no/nyheter/innenriks/valg/val_2007/resultat/?type=parti&id=v#valresultat

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:00, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Political position

Despite a virtually universal recognition of the party's position as a centrist party by scholars and mainstream media and politics, User:Helper201 (who's similarly odd edits on numerous other articles have been repeatedly reverted by several other users as well) for some reason insist that the party along with the Christian Democrats be labelled "centre-right", supposedly supported by two news-pieces which doesn't give any explanation for why they are at odds with mainstream political science. The reason as I see it probably is just a sloppy generalisation based on the government overall being centre-right, and then automatically assuming this on all the parties involved (the one source apparantly also claims Progress to be centre-right as well as it generically says "the four centre-right parties"). User2534 (talk) 20:50, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Greetings, User talk:User2534. I don't see how my edits are 'odd'. My edits are rarely 'repeatedly reverted'.

Firstly, please let me make it clear that claiming a party to be 'Centre to Centre-right' does not reject the idea that it is mostly centrist, I accept this is mostly the case, however I claim that these party's also lean to the centre-right to a certain degree. I do not claim to deny they are mostly centrist. However both the Liberal Party and the Christian Democratic Party have in the last two elections formed a centre-right grouping and appear to be in support of a third straight centre-right grouping for the 2017 general election. The formation of three consecutive centre-right groupings is a clear indication towards a leaning in support of that political position, rather than taking a purely centrist, independent stance (or forming a centrist grouping) in the elections. However I will concede on policy there is more weight to the Christian Democratic Party leaning to the centre-right than the Liberal Party. The CDP is a member of the European People's Party, which is clearly a centre-right group, while most Christian parties in Europe and European Christian democratic parties also hold a centre-right position, for example: CDA in the Netherlands, CD&V in Belgium, CDU in Germany, KD in Sweden, CVP in Switzerland, etc. This is because generally Christian parties in Europe tend to lean towards conservative social polices, of which conservatism is generally seen as a centre-right position and the Christian Democrats in Norway also follow a conservative line to a certain extent. Therefore this claim is in support of these two parties to be centre-right, TO AN EXTENT and does not reject the political position of centrist.

Also I find it hard to see why an article on the official website of Norway in the UK is not legitimate, this is one of the best sources one could use. This is the site used to get in contact with the Norwegian Embassy and Consulates. Helper201 (talk) 13:39, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

If you agree it's mostly centrist I don't understand why you have to make a totally unnecessary controversy with this. Your attempts of comparing the Norwegian Christian Democrats with European counterparts only demonstrate your lack of basic knowledge given that the Norwegian party for instance has a more left-leaning position on economic policy than most of those parties. Both the Liberals and Christian Democrats refused to join the government because they thought it to be to rightist, and there has been major disputes on numerous issues as well as the annual national budgets every year since, even to the point that the Christian Democrats have seriously flirted with the idea of alligning with the Labour Party for the upcoming election. The three "centrist parties" sentrumspartiene (also including Centre-Sp) is one of the major institutions and alliances in Norwegian politics, and they're all open about their primary preference of a new centrist government if they had enough public support. User2534 (talk) 10:26, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

You are the one claiming it to be controversial. These are not poor sources and they are not denying the primary position. No, I am aware of the Christian Democrats economic leanings to the left, however they are socially to the right and if credible sources point to an overall position of centre-right, you should leave it as such. Helper201 (talk) 23:10, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Liberal Party (Norway). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090922214725/http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/iriks/politikk/article3268805.ece to http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/iriks/politikk/article3268805.ece

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:52, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Liberal Party (Norway). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100612032210/http://www.venstre.no/print.php?article=981 to http://www.venstre.no/print.php?article=981
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070418003337/http://www.uv.no/politics/translated-items/culture-wants-to-be-free?set_language=en to http://www.uv.no/politics/translated-items/culture-wants-to-be-free?set_language=en

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:32, 22 December 2017 (UTC)