Talk:Lieutenant Governor of North Carolina

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lieutenant Governor of North Carolina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090228003855/http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/homeless_lieutenant_governors_next_on_oprah to http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/homeless_lieutenant_governors_next_on_oprah
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081023211856/http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/a_curse_on_lieutenant_governors to http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/a_curse_on_lieutenant_governors

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:53, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Mark Robinson 2000s (cropped).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:59, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Robert Franklin Armfield

Robert Franklin Armfield was (3rd) Lieutenant Governor in the Time of 1875–1876, according to [1] why is he not named and counted in here? So Mark Robinson would be the 36th one. In german wikipedia he is counted so we have now 36 Lieutenant Governor. I wont do such a big improvement in a foreign language. So please change it, if that fact is correct. Thank you Thopas (talk) 11:16, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

• • Not according to the NC Manual, which I would consider more authoritative in that regard. -Indy beetle (talk) 09:44, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Issues with terms of office

I was reading up on the North Carolina Constitution recently. Article III, Section 2, Subsection 1, states; “Their term of office shall be four years and shall commence on the first day of January next after their election and continue until their successors are elected and qualified” which refers to the terms of both the Governor and Lieutenant Governor of North Carolina. This has been in the NC Constitution since 1971 so all governors and lt. governors after 1971 have started their terms on January 1st, therefore we have been using the governors public inauguration dates as their term starts which are incorrect, furthermore stands with the council of state. NorthSouthCarolinian (talk) 06:54, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

• • In the 2013 Oxford Commentary series book The North Carolina State Constitution (second ed.), which is an extensive annotation of the state constitution (one of the coauthors is Justice Paul Newby), actually points out that while the term does officially begin then, an officer's term does not start until they've been officially sworn-in (and their predecessor continues to serve until that point; pages of interest are 116, 165, 167, 168). This is why Gov. Roy Copper had a nonpublic swearing-in ceremony on early in the morning on January 1, 2017, even though his inaugural ceremony was a few days later; he could have not legally exercised any duties of the office otherwise. We have no recorded instance of Robinson swearing-in on January 1, 2021. -Indy beetle (talk) 09:44, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Statutory duties

• NLGA

-Indy beetle (talk) 09:44, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

• [2] -Indy beetle (talk) 16:06, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• MarkRobinsonHeadshot.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:37, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Mark Robinson (cropped).png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:22, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lieutenant Governor of North Carolina/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ErnestKrause (talk · contribs) 22:11, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Review process started and may take a few days for placing initial comments. ErnestKrause (talk) 22:11, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Starting with comments:

(1) Lead section and the article appears to be well-written in general. For the lead section, its the paragraph breaks which might look a little better if you move the first two sentences of the second paragraph into the first paragraph. After that, if you could move the first sentence of your paragraph three to the end of paragraph two, and it might look better. Currently, the material appears to be a bunched up at the end and these new paragraph breaks might be useful.

(2) Your date for starting the Background section is directly after the end of the Civil War and I'm wondering about this historical transition in 1868. Was there nothing useful to say about the State administration hierarchy both before the Civil War and during the Civil War which might be of interest to readers of this article? Where there any changes which were enacted upon the Southern states after the War because of the outcome of the War? Were there any protocols imposed during Reconstruction which made certain requirements upon the Southern states? Which versions of the previous state constitutions, which years, were used for defining the office of Lieut. Governor? Was there an analogous office prior to the Civil War?

(3) The Table at the end of the article is a little bulky looking and I'm wondering if a two column format might improve things in terms of the current list being so very long. The third column (years in office) and the fourth column (party affiliation) in the list, it seems, could be 'coded' into the first column; just state the party and the years under the name of the elected official as you already do in your last column. That would reduce the number of columns in the list and allow for a "div col 2" approach for the List as a whole.

Indy beetle: These are the main items at this time; let me know if any clarifications are needed. ErnestKrause (talk) 19:07, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

• Re point 1: I've split it mostly along your lines, though I've made some alterations to better retain thematic cohesion in the paragraphs.
• Re point 2: I've revised this text to better emphasize that the office of lieutenant governor replaced the speaker of the Senate. As far as the wider trend of political change is concerned, the constitution was changed to be a "more democratic" and progressive document to suit Reconstruction, broadly speaking. It was partly based off of some northern constitutions (those of Pennsylvania and Ohio, I believe), so that might be be where the idea for the office came from. However, I've seen no sources specifically make this point with regards to the lieutenant governor of North Carolina, so I feel it would be UNDUE to talk about it here. The official journal of the 1868 convention is not very enlightening as to why the office was adopted, aside from an explanatory addendum by two delegates printed with the constitution who note that it is a new office, had apparently been discussed since 1865, and was needed to provide for vacancies in the governor's office (which is odd, considering there were previously other means of filling in a vacant governor's seat).
• I'm frankly not very good at coding tables, and I don't see how breaking this chronological ascending order into two side-by-side columns would help much in terms of reader comprehension when one can just keep scrolling.

-Indy beetle (talk) 02:10, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

(1) Lead section looks better.

(2) If you can add that Pennsylvania or Ohio even used the off ice of Lieut. Governor historically before North Carolina did, then it would add to the article's historical context. Do you think that North Carolina may have been the first in the South to introduce this office?

• • Ohio had one before NC, Pennsylvania's didn't come until later. I have no source making that connection anyhow, so it would be pure speculation to argue that NC got the idea from Ohio. And no with regards to the second question, Lieutenant Governor of Mississippi existed in 1817 and Lieutenant Governor of Arkansas existed in 1864.

(3) The table is occasionally printed out by readers of the article using the Wikipedia options to print out articles and that gets a bit lengthy for this table format which you have chosen. I'm still thinking along the lines of two columns; the first half of the list goes in the first column, and the second half goes in the second column. If you don't know how, then you might post it on one of the helper pages for a quick response, and possibly someone can do it for you. The print out size will be twice as small in pages printed in a two column format. ErnestKrause (talk) 18:10, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

• Have a look now, I set the width to 40em.

• I've looked at it and it looks much better. I'm going to make an optional comment before closing this GAN, and both the Lead section and the two column format Table look much better. My optional comment is that my own reading would be nicely informed if the article said that there were other states that used the Lieut. Governor model and maybe give one or two examples. That way other readers will not be wondering if North Carolina was setting some sort of precedent in the South or elsewhere. I'm leaving that as optional though since the article is passed as reaching GAN. ErnestKrause (talk) 18:03, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Thank you. I'll note that the existence of other lieutenant governors is already alluded to with By 1982, North Carolina had one of the most powerful lieutenant governorships in the country. -Indy beetle (talk) 01:29, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 18:22, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that the Lieutenant Governor of North Carolina is the only elected official in North Carolina with both executive and legislative powers? Source: https://ltgov.nc.gov/about#:~:text=The%20Lieutenant%20Governor%20of%20North,Lieutenant%20Governor%20is%20Mark%20Robinson. , https://www.sosnc.gov/static_forms/publications/nc_manual/2011_2012/Council_Of_State_Executive.pdf (Page 28 on PDF).
  • ALT1: ... that the Lieutenant Governor of North Carolina is first in line of succession of the governor of North Carolina? Source: same as above.
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Ball Ground, Georgia

Improved to Good Article status by Indy beetle (talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke (talk) at 14:41, 18 November 2022 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article meets all requirements for DYK and the first hook is interesting, accurate, and cited. PizzaKing13 ^¡Hablame! 19:59, 22 November 2022 (UTC)